Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jul 13.
Published in final edited form as: Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013 Oct 29;142(2):389–398. doi: 10.1007/s10549-013-2739-z

Table 4.

Secondary endpoints: serum, urine, and radiographic correlative studies

Secondary endpoints Pre-treatment Mean (SD) Post-treatment Mean (SD) p Value (t test)
Serum lipid levels
 Total cholesterol (mg/dl) 202 (45.7) 194 (39.6) 0.51
 LDL (mg/dl) 121 (34.3) 115 (32.1) 0.53
Serum markers
 CRP (pg/mL 1.22 (1.77) 0.973 (1.22) 0.61
 IGF-1 (ng/mL) 17.4 (4.38) 15.3 (4.96) 0.16
 IGFBP-3 (ng/mL) 19.9 (5.45) 20.6 (5.62) 0.69
 IGF-1/IGFBP-3 ratio 0.915 (0.313) 0.778 (0.274) 0.15
Urine markers
 Lipid peroxidation (pg/mg) 8,422 (5451) 8,241 (6537) 0.91
 Oxidative DNA damage (8-oxo-dG) (ng/mL)   104 (84.3)   138 (97.3) 0.18
 Mammographic density, BI-RADSa 2.77 (1.11) 2.67 (1.08) 0.79
Genotype (%, 95 % CI)
HMGCR genotypeb A/A (50.0 %, 32.1–67.9 %)b
A/T (38.5 %, 22.4–57.5 %)
T/T (11.5 %, 3.2–29.8 %)

Lipid levels were available for 25 participants, serum markers for 20 participants, and mammographic density for 18 participants. Lipid peroxidation, oxidative DNA damage, and HMGCR genotypes were available for all 26 participants

a

BI-RADS composition system for mammographic density assessment: 1 (predominantly fatty), 2 (scattered fibroglandular densities), 3 (heterogeneously dense), and 4 (extremely dense) [27]

b

No correlation was observed with HMGCR genotype and changes in lipid levels