Table 3.
Method | Ranking Details | AUC |
---|---|---|
Uniform weight 1 | Count SNVs in CD genes. | 0.743 |
Uniform weight 2 | Count SNVs in CD genes and their STRINGdb interactors. | 0.736 |
Mixed pedigree 1 | Max one control per family. Count SNVs in CD genes. | 0.844 |
Mixed pedigree 2 | Max one control per family. Count pathogenic SNVs (according to SIFT) in CD genes. | 0.688 |
Mixed pedigree 3 | Max one control per family. Look for families with large difference in SNVs count in CD genes. | 0.798 |
Bi-clustering | Bi-clustering on the dataset. Rank according to the number of SNVs in CD genes. | 0.866 |
The submissions have a high correlation, ranging between 0.67 and 0.89. This is mainly due to (1) a similar set of variants selected for all methods and (2) the use of transductive clustering from CAGI 11. The use of clustering is critical to maximize performance.