Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Hum Mutat. 2017 Mar 21;38(9):1193–1200. doi: 10.1002/humu.23177

Table 3.

Performance on the CAGI 13 dataset.

Method Ranking Details AUC
Uniform weight 1 Count SNVs in CD genes. 0.743
Uniform weight 2 Count SNVs in CD genes and their STRINGdb interactors. 0.736
Mixed pedigree 1 Max one control per family. Count SNVs in CD genes. 0.844
Mixed pedigree 2 Max one control per family. Count pathogenic SNVs (according to SIFT) in CD genes. 0.688
Mixed pedigree 3 Max one control per family. Look for families with large difference in SNVs count in CD genes. 0.798
Bi-clustering Bi-clustering on the dataset. Rank according to the number of SNVs in CD genes. 0.866

The submissions have a high correlation, ranging between 0.67 and 0.89. This is mainly due to (1) a similar set of variants selected for all methods and (2) the use of transductive clustering from CAGI 11. The use of clustering is critical to maximize performance.