Table 2. Comparison of trunk muscle activation between the two groups.
Experimental groupa | Control groupb | ||
---|---|---|---|
IO (%) | pre | 32.1 ± 12.0c | 35.0 ± 9.3 |
post | 61.0 ± 6.0*† | 50.28 ± 7.5* | |
EO (%) | pre | 41.3 ± 12.3 | 39.2 ± 5.2 |
post | 65.6 ± 7.0*† | 53.94 ± 8.7* | |
RA (%) | pre | 29.1 ± 6.1 | 33.8 ± 7.4 |
post | 66.4 ± 10.0*† | 52.6 ± 6.2* | |
MF (%) | pre | 40.3 ± 9.5 | 41.6 ± 7.4 |
post | 69.0 ± 12.1*† | 54.9 ± 9.1* |
amotor imagery training, btrunk control training, cmean ± standard deviation. *significant difference within group (p<0.05)
†significant difference between group (p<0.05). IO: internal oblique; EO: external oblique; RA: rectus abdominis; MF: multifidus