Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 13;14(3):784–791. doi: 10.1007/s13311-017-0512-4

Table 2.

The risk of all-cause dementia between cilostazol cohort and comparison cohort

Case no. % cHR (95% CI) p-value aHR (95% CI) p-value
Comparison cohort (n = 6861) 586 8.5 Ref. Ref.
Cilostazol cohort (n = 2287) 109 4.8 0.77 (0.63–0.95) 0.015 0.75 (0.61–0.92) 0.006
<86 DDDs (N= 763) 40 5.2 0.90 (0.65–1.24) 0.527 0.88 (0.64–1.22) 0.448
86–217 DDDs (N= 762) 38 5.0 0.91 (0.65–1.26) 0.567 0.92 (0.66–1.27) 0.602
>217 DDDs (N= 762) 31 4.1 0.57 (0.40–0.82) 0.002 0.53 (0.37–0.76) 0.001
p for trend 0.003 0.001

Adjusted for age, sex, all comorbidities, and history of medication. cHR = crude hazard ratio; CI = confidence interval; aHR = adjusted hazard ratio; DDD = defined daily dose.