Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 25;26(8):2067–2078. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1541-5

Table 3.

Modeling self-reported EQ-VAS scores by country and EQ-5D version

Japan EQ-5D-3L UK EQ-5D-3L Japan EQ-5D-5L England EQ-5D-5L Spain EQ-5D-5L
Coef P value Coef P value Coef P value Coef P value Coef P value
Mobility −0.88 0.785 −5.87 0.000 −2.87 0.029 −3.46 0.000 −0.35 0.719
Self-care −5.42 0.394 −6.82 0.000 −4.41 0.128 −0.21 0.836 −3.29 0.065
Usual activities −9.50 0.018 −8.54 0.000 −9.61 0.000 −4.87 0.000 −5.86 0.000
Pain/discomfort −11.03 0.000 −6.80 0.000 −4.53 0.000 −3.28 0.000 −4.59 0.000
Anxiety/depression −7.22 0.003 −8.02 0.000 −5.83 0.000 −6.96 0.000 −7.87 0.000
Constant 115.80 0.000 125.80 0.000 114.94 0.000 105.99 0.000 109.82 0.000
Adjusted R-squareda 0.2027 0.4226 0.2285 0.5031 0.4026
N 543 3372 1026 996 1000

Note: (1) Shapiro–Wilk test rejected the null hypothesis of normally distributed residuals in all five regressions at the 5% significance level. (2) The Breusch–Pagan test accepted the null hypothesis that the variance of the residuals is homogeneous at the 5% significance level for the Japan EQ-5D-3L model, but rejected the null hypothesis in all other four models. (3) The regression equation specification error test (RESET) rejected the null hypothesis of linear functional form for the specifications in Japan EQ-5D-5L model and Spain EQ-5D-5L model at the 5% significance level. (4) None of the five models indicated issues with multicollinearity (mean variance inflation factor < 3)

aAdjusted R-squared is computed using the formula 1 − [(1 − Rsq) × (N − 1)/(N − k − 1)], where Rsq represents R-squared (the proportion of variance in the dependent variable that can be explained by the independent variables); N represents the number of observations; and k represents the number of independent variables