Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 14;4(4):ENEURO.0025-17.2017. doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0025-17.2017

Table 4.

Summary of the results of the behavioral outcomes used for phenotype analysis in APPSwe mice

Behavior Test Dependent variable Genotype Treatment Mean ± SEM p value Interpretation
Locomotion AC Ambulatory distance (cm) APPSwe nTg Vehicle 108.20 ± 9.45 APPSwe Tg mice exhibit locomotor hyperactivity
ISRIB 88.75 ± 6.40 ns
APPSwe Tg Vehicle 124.80 ± 9.78 ns
ISRIB 139.50 ± 15.10 ns
Center duration (s) APPSwe nTg Vehicle 90.97 ± 12.30
ISRIB 83.92 ± 13.13 ns
APPSwe Tg Vehicle 173.40 ± 13.15 p < 0.01
ISRIB 154.50 ± 21.89 p < 0.05
Fear-associated learning Baseline Freezing (%) APPSwe nTg Vehicle 0.38 ± 0.23 APPSwe Tg mice display impairments in fear-associated learning
ISRIB 2.82 ± 2.34 ns
APPSwe Tg Vehicle 1.50 ± 1.26 ns
ISRIB 0.57 ± 0.37 ns
Tone 1 APPSwe nTg Vehicle 5.69 ± 2.33
ISRIB 8.43 ± 4.31 ns
APPSwe Tg Vehicle 2.72 ± 1.61 ns
ISRIB 1.90 ± 1.39 ns
ITI1 APPSwe nTg Vehicle 22.83 ± 6.21
ISRIB 24.18 ± 4.67 ns
APPSwe Tg Vehicle 11.62 ± 5.76 ns
ISRIB 8.79 ± 3.27 ns
Tone 2 APPSwe nTg Vehicle 30.36 + 8.32
ISRIB 39.02 ± 8.62 ns
APPSwe Tg Vehicle 17.13 ± 5.71 ns
ISRIB 14.15 ± 4.93 ns
ITI2 APPSwe nTg Vehicle 52.64 ± 6.80
ISRIB 60.00 ± 5.69 ns
APPSwe Tg Vehicle 18.26 ± 3.56 p < 0.0001
ISRIB 12.42 ± 3.62 p < 0.0001
Fear-based retrieval Context based APPSwe nTg Vehicle 49.45 ± 6.35 APPSwe Tg exhibit impaired context-based fear memory retrieval
ISRIB 50.76 ± 5.95 ns
APPSwe Tg Vehicle 25.93 ± 3.63 p < 0.01
ISRIB 20.10 ± 4.03 p < 0.001
Cue based APPSwe nTg Vehicle 50.12 ± 10.06 APPSwe Tg mice do not display impairments in cue-based fear memory retrieval
ISRIB 56.82 ± 7.39 ns
APPSwe Tg Vehicle 32.64 ± 5.32 ns
ISRIB 34.35 ± 6.74 ns
Spatial acquisition learning MWM D1 Escape latency (s) APPSwe nTg Vehicle 33.10 ± 4.88 ns APPSwe Tg do not exhibit impairments in spatial memory acquisition
ISRIB 16.08 ± 3.15 ns
APPSwe Tg Vehicle 32.56 ± 5.84 ns
ISRIB 24.57 ± 6.55 ns
MWM D2 APPSwe nTg Vehicle 31.44 ± 5.30 ns
ISRIB 12.66 ± 2.79 ns
APPSwe Tg Vehicle 26.21 ± 5.01 ns
ISRIB 29.79 ± 6.50 ns
MWM D3 APPSwe nTg Vehicle 23.02 ± 3.74 ns
ISRIB 9.58 ± 1.93 ns
APPSwe Tg Vehicle 19.19 ± 2.90 ns
ISRIB 19.92 ± 3.92 ns
MWM D4 APPSwe nTg Vehicle 25.95 ± 4.86 ns
ISRIB 6.91 ± 1.21 ns
APPSwe Tg Vehicle 21.12 ± 3.41 ns
ISRIB 14.86 ± 1.82 ns
MWM D5 APPSwe nTg Vehicle 16.56 ± 3.15 p < 0.01
ISRIB 19.04 ± 7.50 ns
APPSwe Tg Vehicle 17.29 ± 2.99 ns
ISRIB 12.30 ± 1.49 ns
MWM R APPSwe nTg Vehicle 66.35 ± 7.55 p < 0.0001
ISRIB 37.79 ± 9.25 ns
APPSwe Tg Vehicle 71.21 ± 6.16 p < 0.0001
ISRIB 58.59 ± 8.69 p < 0.0001
Spatial memory recall Probe test Duration (%) APPSwe nTg Vehicle −13.65 ± 4.63 p < 0.05 APPSwe Tg display intact spatial memory recall
ISRIB −27.80 ± 7.17 p < 0.05
APPSwe Tg Vehicle −18.06 ± 5.72 p < 0.05
ISRIB −18.74 ± 6.18 p < 0.05
Working memory Y-maze Alternation (%) APPSwe nTg Vehicle 62.17 ± 1.71 p < 0.0001 APPSwe Tg mice display impaired working memory
ISRIB 56.77 ± 3.52 ns
APPSwe Tg Vehicle 56.23 ± 3.71 ns
ISRIB 55.46 ± 3.61 ns
Recognition memory NOR Duration (%) APPSwe nTg Vehicle −28.39 ± 10.47 p < 0.05 APPSwe Tg exhibit deficits in recognition memory
ISRIB 1.95 ± 19.43 ns
APPSwe Tg Vehicle 9.34 ± 13.48 ns
ISRIB 7.32 ± 12.88 ns

Comparisons made to nTg vehicle control. AC, activity chamber; ITI, intertrial interval; D1-5, day 1-5; R, reversal trial.