Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jul 14.
Published in final edited form as: IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2011 Dec 5;31(5):1008–1020. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2011.2178122

Fig. 10. Comparison of results against laborious manual human segmentation of synthetic images.

Fig. 10

The accuracy of our method’s segmentation of the synthetic image sequence (for the six frames shown in Fig 4) compared to the accuracy of three humans. The error plotted in the y-axis is the average number of misclassified pixels per boundary-length, where boundary-length is the average of the lengths of the ground truth and segmented boundary. Our method differed from the ground truth by 0.30 ± 0.10 pixels. The humans performed significantly worse with error of 0.61 ± 0.14 pixels.