Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 19;13(4):914–929. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2017.65239

Table I.

Clinical trials concerning evolocumab (AMG 145) – PROFICIO Program

Phase II
Study Population Dosage LDL-C reduction
MENDEL (n = 406, evolocumab = 271, ezetimibe = 45, placebo = 90) [59] Patients with hypercholesterolemia (LDL-C in the range 100–190 mg/dl) without lipid-lowering therapy Evolocumab 70, 105, or 140 mg every 2 weeks, 280, 350, or 420 mg every 4 weeks, ezetimibe 10 mg only;
time of treatment = 12 weeks
37–53% (vs. placebo)
RUTHERFORD (n = 168, evolocumab = 112, placebo = 56) [60] Patients with heterozygous FH and hypercholesterolemia (LDL-C ≥ 100 mg/dl) during statin treatment with or without ezetimibe Evolocumab 350 or 420 mg every 4 weeks;
time of treatment = 12 weeks
44–56% (vs. placebo)
LAPLACE-TIMI 57 (n = 631, evolocumab = 474, placebo = 157) [61] Patients with hypercholesterolemia (LDL-C ≥ 85 mg/dl) during statin treatment with or without ezetimibe Evolocumab 70, 105, or 140 mg every 2 weeks, 280, 350, or 420 mg every 4 weeks;
time of treatment = 12 weeks
42–66% (vs. placebo)
GAUSS (n = 160, placebo = 33, evolocumab = 127) [62] Patients with history of statin intolerance Evolocumab 280, 350, or 420 mg every 4 weeks, 420 mg + ezetimibe 10 mg daily every 4 weeks, ezetimibe 10 mg only;
time of treatment = 12 weeks
26–47% (vs. placebo)
YUKAWA (n = 310, evolocumab = 207, placebo = 103) [70] Patients at high risk for cardiovascular events with hypercholesterolemia (LDL-C ≥ 116 mg/dl) during statin treatment evolocumab 70 or 140 mg every 2 weeks, 280 or 420 mg every 4 weeks;
time of treatment = 12 weeks
53–69% (vs. placebo)
Phase III
Study Population Dosage LDL-C reduction Percentage of patients achieving LDL-C level < 70 mg/dl Additional results
MENDEL 2 (n = 614) [71] Patients with hypercholesterolemia (LDL-C in the range 100–190 mg/dl) and Framingham risk scores ≤ 10% Evolocumab 140 mg every 2 weeks, 420 mg every 4 weeks, ezetimibe 10 mg daily, placebo;
time of treatment = 12 weeks
55–57% in evolocumab group compared with placebo and 38–40% compared with ezetimibe 69–72% vs. 0–1% vs. 1–2% (evolocumab vs. placebo vs. ezetimibe) Significant reduction of APOB, Lp(a), non-HDL-C, TG, VLDL as well as TC/HDL-C and APOB/APOA1; significant increase in HDL-C compared with placebo
RUTHERFORD-2 (n = 331) [72] Patients with heterozygous FH and hypercholesterolemia (LDL-C ≥ 100 mg/dl) despite intense lipid-lowering therapy Evolocumab 140 mg every 2 weeks, 420 mg every 4 weeks, placebo;
time of treatment = 12 weeks
60–66% in evolocumab group compared with placebo 63–68% vs. 2% (evolocumab vs. placebo) Reduction of TG by 19.6% and Lp(a) by 31.6%; increase of HDL-C by 9.2% compared with placebo
LAPLACE-2 (n = 1899) [73] Patients with hypercholesterolemia
(LDL-C ≥ 150 mg/dl (no statin at screening), ≥ 100 mg/dl (non-intensive statin), or ≥ 80 mg/dl (intensive statin)).
Intensive statin therapy was defined as daily atorvastatin (≥ 40 mg), rosuvastatin (20 mg), simvastatin (80 mg), or any statin plus ezetimibe
Evolocumab 140 mg every 2 weeks, 420 mg every 4 weeks, ezetimibe 10 mg daily, placebo;
time of treatment = 12 weeks
59–66% in evolocumab group from baseline and 63–75% compared with placebo 86–94% of patients in moderate-intensity statin therapy with evolocumab, 93–95% of patients in high-intensity statin therapy with evolocumab, 17–20% of patients receiving moderate-intensity statins and 51–62% of those receiving high-intensity statins with ezetimibe Significant reduction of non-HDL-C (52–59% from baseline, 58–65% vs. placebo), APOB (47–56% from baseline, 51–59% vs. placebo) and Lp(a) (24–39% from baseline, 21–36% vs. placebo) for all statin groups; reduction in TG (6–16% from baseline, 12–30% vs. placebo); increase in HDL-C (5–10% from baseline, 4–10% vs. placebo)
GAUSS-2 (n = 307) [74] Patients with hypercholesterolemia and statin intolerance
(LDL-C ≥ 100 mg/dl with diagnosed CHD or risk equivalent, ≥ 130 mg/dl without CHD or risk equivalent and ≥ 2 risk factors, ≥ 160 mg/dl without CHD or risk equivalent and one risk factor, or ≥ 190 mg/dl without CHD or risk equivalent and no risk factors)
Evolocumab 140 mg every 2 weeks, 420 mg every 4 weeks, ezetimibe 10 mg daily;
time of treatment = 12 weeks
55–56% from baseline, 37–39% compared with ezetimibe 87.5% vs. 2% (evolocumab vs. ezetimibe) Reduction of Lp(a) by 22–27% vs. 1.7–5.8% (evolocumab vs. ezetimibe)
DESCARTES (n = 901) [75] Patients with hypercholesterolemia (LDL-C ≥ 75 mg/dl after 4–12 weeks run-in period of lipid-lowering therapy (diet alone, diet plus atorvastatin 10 mg daily, atorvastatin 80 mg daily, or atorvastatin 80 mg plus ezetimibe 10 mg daily)) Evolocumab 420 mg every 4 weeks, ezetimibe 10 mg daily, placebo;
time of treatment = 52 weeks
49–62% compared with placebo 82.3% vs. 6.4% (evolocumab vs. placebo) Significant reduction of APOB (44.2%), non-HDL-C (50.3%), Lp(a) (22.4%) and TG (11.5%); significant increase of HDL-C (5.4%) and ApoA1 (3.0%)
TESLA (n = 50) [76] Patients with homozygous FH on lipid-lowering therapy for at least 4 weeks Evolocumab 420 mg every 4 weeks, placebo;
time of treatment = 12 weeks
30.9% compared with placebo
YUKAWA-2 (n = 404) [77] Patients with hypercholesterolemia (LDL-C ≥ 100 mg/dl) at high risk for cardiovascular events based on Japan Atherosclerosis Society criteria Evolocumab 140 mg every 2 weeks, 420 mg every 4 weeks, placebo;
time of treatment = 12 weeks
67–76% compared with placebo 96–98% in evolocumab group, 0–4% in placebo group receiving atorvastatin 5 mg/day, 20% in placebo group receiving atorvastatin 20 mg/day Reduction of APOB (56–66%), HDL-C (10–17%), Lp(a) (40–53%)
Ongoing
Study Purpose
GAUSS-3 to assess the efficacy and safety of evolocumab in subjects with statin intolerance
OSLER-2 to assess the long-term safety, tolerability and efficacy of evolocumab in subjects with hyperlipidemia or mixed dyslipidemia
TAUSSIG to assess the long-term efficacy and safety of evolocumab in subjects with severe FH
FOURIER to evaluate the influence of LDL-C reduction with evolocumab used in addition to other lipid-lowering treatment on the risk of cardiovascular death, MI, hospitalization for unstable angina, stroke, or coronary revascularization in subjects with clinically evident CVD
GLAGOV to evaluate the influence of LDL-C reduction with evolocumab on atherosclerotic plaque regression measured by intravascular ultrasound in subjects with CHD taking lipid-lowering therapy
EBBINGHAUS to evaluate the influence of treatment with evolocumab on neurocognitive functions in high cardiovascular risk subjects
FLOREY to evaluate the effect of evolocumab, atorvastatin, and combination therapy on lipoprotein kinetics (completed)

APOA1 – apolipoprotein A1, APOB – apolipoprotein B, CHD – coronary heart disease, CVD – cardiovascular disease, FH – familial hypercholesterolemia, HDL-C – high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, LDL-C – low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, Lp(a) – lipoprotein (a), MI – myocardial infarctions, TC – total cholesterol, TG – triglycerides.