Table 2.

Pearson’s correlations between child food neophobia and measures of parental feeding strategies, parental demand cognitions regarding child eating, and division of responsibility (DoR) feeding practices.

Food Neophobia Scale association with:	Full Sample	Girls Only	Boys Only
Restriction of Child Feedinga	0.10	0.11	0.07
	[132]	[70]	[62]
Encouragement to Eata	−0.04	−0.11	0.07
	[132]	[70]	[62]
Monitoring Fat Intakea	−0.00	0.01	−0.02
	[132]	[70]	[62]
Anger and Frustrationb	−0.03	−0.12	0.07
	[132]	[70]	[62]
Food Amount Demandingnessb	−0.10	−0.20	0.01
	[132]	[70]	[62]
Food Type Demandingnessb	−0.15	−0.29*	0.04
	[132]	[70]	[62]
Mother-allotted child food choicec	0.14	0.12	0.14
	[108]	[56]	[52]
Child Eating Compliance of Prompted Foodsc	−0.36**	−0.44**	−0.36**
	[106]	[54]	[52]
Child Eating Compliance of Initially Refused Foodsc	−0.48**	−0.60**	−0.36**
	[108]	[56]	[52]

^aFrom the Child Feeding Questionnaire³²;

^bFrom the Feeding Demands Questionnaire³⁵;

^cFrom the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth³⁷.

^*p <0.05,

^**p< 0.001

Note: The number in the parenthesis is the sample size for the given correlation coefficient. The full sample is less than N=132 for certain association due to missing data (i.e., questionnaires that were not completed by the parent). This is also the reason why the N’s were less than 70 and 62 in certain analyses for girls and boys, respectively.