Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Acad Nutr Diet. 2017 Mar 6;117(6):851–858. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2017.01.013

Table 2.

Descriptive statistics and correlations among self-care capacity, perceived health, loneliness, depressive affect and nutritional status in Structural Equation Modeling model among older adults residing in rural Oklahoma.

Perceived Health Status c Self-Care Capacity d Loneliness e Depressive Affect f Nutritional Status g
Correlation
 Self-Care Capacity 0.31a - - - -
 Loneliness −0.13 0.05 - - -
 Depressive Affect −0.31a −0.14 0.42a - -
 Nutritional Status 0.15 0.13 −0.07 −0.27a -
Mean 9.75 38.38 18.09 1.36 12.09
SDb 2.11 1.15 4.23 1.93 1.48
Minimum 4.00 33.00 10.00 0.00 8.00
Maximum 14.00 39.00 29.00 9.00 14.00
Skewness - - 0.17 1.83 −0.72
Kurtosis - - −0.58 3.41 −0.07
a

Significant at p<0.01

b

Standard deviation.

c

Perceived health status was measured using the Subjective Health Perceptions Scale.29 Perceived health status scores range from 4 to 14. A higher score represents higher perceived health.

d

Self-Care Capacity was measured using the Self-Care Capacity Scale.29 Self-care capacity scores range from 13 to 39. A higher score reflects higher self-care capacity.

e

Loneliness was measured using the Loneliness Scale-Version.30 Loneliness scores range from 10 to 29. A higher score indicates higher feelings of loneliness.

f

Depressive Affect was measured using the Geriatric Depression Scale.31 Depression scores range from 0 to 10 with a higher score indicating a higher depressive affect.

g

Nutritional Status was measured using the Mini-Nutritional Assessment Short-Form.32 Nutritional Status scores range from 0 to 14. A higher score indicates high nutritional status.