Skip to main content
. 2017 May 2;8(5):551–554. doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2017.04.006

Table 1.

Randomized controlled trials lowering serum uric acid and its effect on renal function.

Study (Primary author and year) Population Intervention Results
Gibson et al. (1982) [29] 59 patients with primary gout Colchicine and allopurinol versus colchicine alone Retarded an apparent decline of renal function over 2 years
Chanard et al. (2003) [30] 48 renal transplant patients with hypertension, on cyclosporine Amlodipine or tertatolol Amlodipine decreased serum uric acid levels and increased glomerular filtration rate as compared with tertatolol
Siu et al. (2006) [20] 54 hyperuricemic patients with CKD Allopurinol versus standard therapy No significant differences but a trend toward a lower serum creatinine level in the treatment group compared with controls after 12 months of therapy
Liu and Sheng (2007) [31] 47 hyperuricemic patients with CKD Allopurinol versus standard therapy Serum creatinine was lower in the allopurinol group and the rate of renal function deterioration was significantly decreased over 12 months
Kanbay et al. (2007) [32] 59 patients Allopurinol given to the hyperuricemic patients and no uric acid lowering therapy for the normouricemic patients Allopurinol therapy significantly improved GFR but proteinuria was unchanged
Malaguarnera et al. (2009) [33] 38 elderly patients with hyperuricemia Rasburicase versus placebo Significant reduction in creatinine and an increase in creatinine clearance over 2 months
Goicoechea et al. (2010) [22] 113 patients with estimated GFR <60 mL/min Allopurinol versus standard therapy (no uric acid lowering therapy) Allopurinol treatment slowed down renal disease progression independent of age, gender, diabetes, C-reactive protein, albuminuria and renin-angiotensin blocker use over 24 months
Momeni et al. (2010) [34] 40 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and diabetic nephropathy (proteinuria of 500 mg/day and serum creatinine level <3 mg/dL) Allopurinol versus placebo Allopurinol reduced severity of proteinuria after 4 months of drug administration. No change in creatinine was noted
Whelton et al. (2011) [35] 116 hyperuricemic patients (post hoc) Febuxostat in 40, 80 or 120 mg doses Improvement or maintenance of estimated GFR was inversely correlated with the quantitative reduction in serum uric acid from baseline over 5 years
Shi et al. (2012) [36] 40 hyperuricemic patients with IgA nephropathy Allopurinol versus standard therapy Hyperuricemia predicted progression of IgA nephropathy independently of baseline estimated GFR over 6 months. No change in renal progression or proteinuria was noted
Pai et al. (2013) [37] 183 hyperuricemic patients with CKD Allopurinol versus standard therapy (no uric acid lowering therapy) Allopurinol was associated with decreased progression of renal disease in CKD
Sircar et al. (2015) [38] 93 hyperuricemic patients with CKD 3 and 4 Febuxostat versus placebo Febuxostat slowed the decline in estimated GFR in CKD stages 3 and 4 compared to placebo