Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Contemp Clin Trials. 2017 Mar 22;57:37–43. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2017.03.014

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of patients who attended at least one intervention session

Total Participants N=55 tMBSR n=27 tSupport n=28
Age
 26 – 44 y 12 (22) 7 (26) 5 (18)
 45 – 54 y 14 (26) 8 (30) 6 (21)
 55 – 64 y 20 (36) 8 (30) 12 (43)
 ≥65 y 9 (16) 4 (15) 5 (18)
53.6 ± 12.1 52.6 ± 12.6 54.6 ± 11.7
Female Sex 31 (56) 19 (70) 12 (43)
Race
 White 42 (76) 19 (70) 23 (82)
 Black 8 (15) 6 (22) 2 (7)
 Other 5 (9) 2 (8) 3 (11)
Hispanic/Latino 1 (2) 1 (4) 0 (0)
Marital status
 Never married 12 (22) 7 (26) 5 (18)
 Married currently 27 (49) 11 (41) 16 (57)
 Widowed or other 16(29) 9 (33) 7 (25)
Education
 ≤ High school 6 (11) 4 (15) 2 (7)
 Some college 25 (45) 12 (44) 13 (46)
 ≥ College graduate 24 (44) 11 (41) 13 (46)
Work status
 Full-time 21 (38) 8 (30) 13 (46)
 Part-time 7 (13) 5 (18) 2 (7)
 Disabled 12 (22) 5 (18) 7 (25)
 Retired 11 (20) 5 (18) 6 (21)
 Other 4 (7) 4 (14) 0 (0)
Dialysis
 Hemodialysis 24 (44) 11 (41) 13 (46)
 Peritoneal dialysis 5 (9) 4 (15) 1 (4)
Body mass index
 18.5 – <25 20 (36) 6 (22) 14 (50)
 25 – <30 16 (29) 10 (37) 6 (21)
 ≥ 30 19 (35) 11 (41) 8 (29)
Charlson comorbidity scorea range: 2 to 8 4.0 ± 1.7 4.3 ± 1.8 3.7 ± 1.6
Self-rated health Excellent, very good or good 25 (45) 11 (40) 14 (50)
 Fair 25 (45) 15 (56) 10 (36)
 Poor 5 (9) 1 (4) 4 (14)
Cause of kidney failure
 Hypertension 4 (7) 2 (7) 2 (7)
 Diabetes 18 (33) 9 (33) 9 (32)
 Polycystic kidney disease 11 (20) 5 (19) 6 (21)
 Chronic glomerulonephritis 2 (4) 1 (4) 1 (4)
 Otherb 16 (29) 9 (33) 7 (25)
 unknown 4 (7) 1 (4) 3 (11)
eGFRc, mL/min/1.732
 range: 3 – 24 12.3 ± 5.5 11.67 ± 5.0 12.9 ± 6.0
 < 15 35 (67) 19 (70) 16 (64)
 15 ≤ eGFR < 30 17 (33) 8 (30) 9 (36)
Time on waitlist
 range: 3 to 1889 d 440.3 ± 425.8 442.6 ± 485.5 438.1 ± 370.5
 unknown 4 (7) 2 (7) 2 (7)

Note: Kidney transplant candidates who attended at least one session of tMBSR or tSupport. Values for categorical variables are given as number (percentage); for continuous variables as mean ± standard deviation.

Abbreviations: eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate

a

Weighted score based on 19 serious comorbidities found on chart review [39].

b

Other causes included lupus (n=2), unspecified genetic or congenital disorders (n=2), radiation, medication toxicity, cancer, infection and other disorders.

c

eGFRs calculated using a MDRD equation.