Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jul 17.
Published in final edited form as: AIDS. 2017 Jul 17;31(11):1611–1619. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000001528

Table 5.

Sensitivity analyses

Parameter varied in rapid arm Per patient enrolled Per patient achieving primary outcome Production cost*

Cost Difference from standard arm (%) Cost Difference from standard arm (%)
Baseline scenario - actual volume and staffing
Standard arm, for comparison 319.08 0.00 (0%) 487.45 0.00 (0%) 738.16
Rapid arm 451.19 132.12 (41%) 505.42 17.97 (4%) 707.09

Patient volume set equal to full patient load of clinic (high volume)**
Standard arm, for comparison 319.08 0.00 (0%) 487.45 0.00 (0%) 738.16
Rapid arm 389.42 70.34 (22%) 451.99 −35.46 (−7%) 610.28

Some tasks shifted from primary health nurse to enrolled nurse**
Standard arm, for comparison 319.08 0.00 (0%) 487.45 0.00 (0%) 738.16
Rapid arm 436.42 117.34 (37%) 490.64 3.19 (1%) 683.94

Assume missing viral loads were suppressed
Standard arm, for comparison 319.08 0.00 (0%) 466.74 0.00 (0%) 638.15
Rapid arm 451.19 132.12 (41%) 490.83 24.09 (5%) 615.26

Assume TB suspects excluded; no POC TB tests**
Standard arm, for comparison 309.41 0.00 (0%) 481.14 0.00 (0%) 760.99
Rapid arm 423.38 113.97 (37%) 482.29 1.15 (0%) 635.07

Minimum cost scenario: excluded TB suspects + high patient volume + enrolled nurse
Standard arm, for comparison 309.41 0.00 (0%) 481.14 0.00 (0%) 760.99
Rapid arm 370.09 60.68 (20%) 429.64 −51.51 (−11%) 555.14
*

Production cost=total cost for all patients in arm/number of patients in arm achieving primary outcome

**

Included in minimum cost scenario