Table 3.
DIMENSIONS OF THE OPAS – INITIAL VISIT | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Eye pain intensity in the past 24h |
Eye pain intensity in the past 2 weeks |
QoL | Aggravating factors |
Associated symptoms |
Non-eye pain intensity |
|
GOLD STD (pain intensity) |
0.81 | 0.57 | 0.64 | 0.41 | 0.33 | 0.47 |
P | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.01 | <0.0001 |
N | 102 | 95 | 102 | 94 | 92 | 102 |
DIMENSIONS OF THE OPAS – FOLLOW-UP VISIT | ||||||
GOLD STD (pain intensity) |
0.93 | 0.68 | 0.74 | 0.64 | 0.33 | 0.19 |
P | <0.0001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.01 | >0.05 | >0.05 |
N | 21 | 18 | 21 | 21 | 19 | 21 |
Composite scores from each of the 6 dimensions of the OPAS were correlated (Spearman’s correlation coefficient, rs) with scores from the gold standard Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale (gold std) at initial (n=102) and follow-up visits (n=21). Ocular pain intensity and interference with quality of life (QoL) dimensions showed the strongest correlations, and lower but significant correlations for aggravating factors, associated factors and non-eye pain intensity dimensions. These results confirm both convergent and discriminant validity of the OPAS that was consistent at the follow-up visit as well. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.