Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jul 17.
Published in final edited form as: Ophthalmology. 2016 Apr 16;123(7):1458–1468. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.03.006

Table 3.

Criterion validity using composite scores of all dimensions of the Ocular Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS).

DIMENSIONS OF THE OPAS – INITIAL VISIT
Eye pain
intensity in the
past 24h
Eye pain
intensity in the
past 2 weeks
QoL Aggravating
factors
Associated
symptoms
Non-eye pain
intensity
GOLD STD
(pain intensity)
0.81 0.57 0.64 0.41 0.33 0.47
P <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.01 <0.0001
N 102 95 102 94 92 102
DIMENSIONS OF THE OPAS – FOLLOW-UP VISIT
GOLD STD
(pain intensity)
0.93 0.68 0.74 0.64 0.33 0.19
P <0.0001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.01 >0.05 >0.05
N 21 18 21 21 19 21

Composite scores from each of the 6 dimensions of the OPAS were correlated (Spearman’s correlation coefficient, rs) with scores from the gold standard Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale (gold std) at initial (n=102) and follow-up visits (n=21). Ocular pain intensity and interference with quality of life (QoL) dimensions showed the strongest correlations, and lower but significant correlations for aggravating factors, associated factors and non-eye pain intensity dimensions. These results confirm both convergent and discriminant validity of the OPAS that was consistent at the follow-up visit as well. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.