Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 17;17:97. doi: 10.1186/s12871-017-0388-1

Table 6.

The regretion analysis of socio–demographic data on the communication towards attitude questionaire of the patients’ relatives according to the informing, empathy and trust sub–dimensions

INFORMING EMPATHY TRUST
β p β p β p
Gender
 Female −1.233 0.009
Education
 Middle school −1.792 0.010 3.566 <0.001 −1.759 0.001
 University
Descriptions of physicians
 Advisor 1.347 0.004
 Friend 1.366 0.033
 Protector 1.366 0.033
Age groups
  < 35 −3.861 <0.001 −4.134 <0.001 −1.872 <0.001
How close the patient relatives were to the patient
 Spouses
 Grandson
 Cousin/distant relative 1.828 0.013
The frequency of patient relatives’ seeing the patients before they were taken to the ICU
 Once in a week or less 7.170 <0.001 1.052 0.014
 Once a day 8.996 <0.001
 Once a week 8.996 <0.001
The frequency of visits to the patients in the ICU by patient relatives
 Once a week
 Everyday 1.363 0.038
 Once in every 2 or 3 days 3.201 <0.001
 Once a week
The duration of how long the patient relatives spoke to the physicians
 1–2 min
 5–10 min −1.974 <0.001
 5–10 min 4.046 0.001
  > 10 mins
The situations that relieved the stress of patient relatives*
 Being with the patient
  No 2.440 0.003 −2.654 <0.001
 Praying
  Yes 8.917 0.004
  No 8.962 0.004 3.369 <0.001
The characteristics of ICU physicians that were important to patient relatives
 Getting good news
  No −3.765 <0.001 −2.165 0.001
 Giving accurate information
  No −1.952 0.019
 Having a sympathetic attitude
  No
 Detailed medical explanation 2.779 0.007
  No −1.579 0.001

* Multiple answers were given

For Informing AIC (akaike information criterion) =512.89, Accuracy 45.2%; Empathy AIC = 516.78, Accuracy 50%; Trust AIC = 373.72, Accuracy 47.2%

The results found statistical difference in group was shown as italicize data