Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 17;18:238. doi: 10.1186/s12882-017-0639-x

Table 1.

Baseline demographics and patient characteristics

CONV UTR UCR p+
N participants 16 18 16
Male [%] 63 61 56 0.93
Center 1 = MUV [%] 69 61 63 0.89
Center 2 = KFJ [%] 6 22 19 0.44
Center 3 = SMZ [%] 25 17 19 0.83
Age [years] 63 ± 13 62 ± 16 61 ± 17 0.94
Time on Dialysis [years] 3.1 ± 2.5 1.9 ± 1.7 3.2 ± 1.8 0.10
Height [cm] 174 ± 11 169 ± 7 170 ± 12 0.38
Body Mass Index [kg/m2] 24.7 ± 6.1 24.3 ± 4.6 22.6 ± 4.4 0.48
No Antihypertensives [%] 0 17 0 0.06
 -Alpha Blockers [%] 50 33 31 0.61
 -Beta Blockers [%] 81 56 69 0.39
 -ACEI/ARB [%] 56 56 31 0.58
 -Calcium Channel Blockers [%] 56 50 63 0.29
 -Vasodilators [%] 25 17 44 0.66
 -‘Central’ Antihypertensives [%] 25 28 31 0.42
 -Diuretics [%] 25 28 25 0.71
Central Venous Catheters [%] 50 56 25 0.17
Hemodiafiltration [%]++ 31 28 31 0.97
Ethnicity
 Caucasian [%] 100 89 94 0.41
 African/Black [%] 0 0 6 0.35
 Asian [%] 0 11 0 0.16
Type 1 DM [%] 0 6 0 0.46
Type 2 DM [%] 31 28 25 0.93
Kidney Disease
 Vascular [%] 19 0 19 0.15
 Glomerular [%] 13 22 19 0.77
 Polycystic [%] 6 0 13 0.32
 Tubulointerstitial [%] 13 22 13 0.68
 Diabetic Glomerulosclerosis [%] 25 17 19 0.83
 Unknown [%] 25 39 19 0.42

CONV conventional hemodialysis, UTR ultrafiltration and temperature regulation, UCR ultrafiltration and dialysate conductivity regulation, N number, DM diabetes mellitus

ITT analysis. +Overall p-values determined by analysis of variance. ++All other patients on hemodialysis