Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 17;18:238. doi: 10.1186/s12882-017-0639-x

Table 4.

Group-wise course of systolic blood pressure

p-value+
CONV UTR UCR Overall
N participants with dry weight reduction 12 17 14
SBP-pre: BCM Measurement [mmHg] 142 ± 27 136 ± 21 148 ± 21 0.28
SBP-pre: Start Intervention Phase [mmHg] 146 ± 19 143 ± 26 154 ± 27 0.45
SBP-post: Start Intervention Phase [mmHg] 133 ± 22 132 ± 17 144 ± 31 0.34
SBP-pre: End Intervention Phase [mmHg] 127 ± 20 127 ± 15 136 ± 13 0.26
SBP-post: End Intervention Phase [mmHg] 112 ± 16 117 ± 15 129 ± 22 0.06
Delta SBP-pre: Start-to-End In Phase [mmHg] −16 ± 23 −16 ± 17 −19 ± 27 0.43
Delta SBP-post: Start-to-End In Ph. [mmHg] −19 ± 19 −16 ± 11 −15 ± 31 0.27

CONV conventional hemodialysis, UTR ultrafiltration and temperature regulation, UCR ultrafiltration and dialysate conductivity regulation, N number, ECV extracellular volume, SBP systolic blood pressure, DBP diastolic blood pressure, BCM body composition monitor

PP analysis. + P-values between groups determined by two-tailed t-test, and Mann-Whitney U test. Overall p-values determined by analysis of variance and analysis of covariance (for comparison of repeated measures). In one patient from the UTR group only absolute fluid overload values could be measured; relative fluid overload values could not be calculated by the BCM device due to technical issues, resulting in deviation of the FO value from ECV