Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 17;18:238. doi: 10.1186/s12882-017-0639-x

Table 5.

Group-wise course of diastolic blood pressure

p-value+
CONV UTR UCR Overall
N participants with dry weight reduction 12 17 14
DBP-pre: BCM Measurement [mmHg] 74 ± 15 67 ± 13 76 ± 20 0.23
DBP-pre: Start Intervention Phase [mmHg] 73 ± 14 70 ± 15 85 ± 26 0.09
DBP-post: Start Intervention Phase [mmHg] 70 ± 13 66 ± 13 75 ± 14 0.17
DBP-pre: End Intervention Phase [mmHg] 66 ± 11 64 ± 11 76 ± 13 0.02
DBP-post: End Intervention Phase [mmHg] 57 ± 15 63 ± 12 69 ± 14 0.10
Delta DBP-pre: Start-to-End In Ph. [mmHg] −7 ± 11 −5 ± 12 −8 ± 31 0.10
Delta DBP-post: Start-to-End In Ph. [mmHg] −12 ± 14 −3 ± 9 −6 ± 14 0.14

CONV conventional hemodialysis, UTR ultrafiltration and temperature regulation, UCR ultrafiltration and dialysate conductivity regulation, N number, ECV extracellular volume, SBP systolic blood pressure, DBP diastolic blood pressure, BCM body composition monitor

PP analysis. + P-values between groups determined by two-tailed t-test, and Mann-Whitney U test. Overall p-values determined by analysis of variance and analysis of covariance (for comparison of repeated measures). In one patient from the UTR group only absolute fluid overload values could be measured; relative fluid overload values could not be calculated by the BCM device due to technical issues, resulting in deviation of the FO value from ECV