Table 2.
Multilevel linear regression model of the relationship between gentrification and collective efficacy adjusted for neighborhood and socio-demographic characteristics
| β | (95% CI) | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Constant | 29.33 | (25.50, 33.16) | 0.00 |
| Age | −0.01 | (−0.04, 0.01) | 0.31 |
| Sex (ref. male) | |||
| Female | −1.08 | (−1.70, −0.46) | 0.00 |
| Language (ref. first language is French) | |||
| First language is not French | −1.09 | (−1.75, −0.43) | 0.00 |
| Education (ref. bachelor’s degree) | |||
| High school or less | 0.46 | (−0.40, 1.31) | 0.30 |
| Post-secondary education of a lower level than a bachelor’s degree | 0.61 | (−0.13, 1.34) | 0.11 |
| Neighborhood poverty | 0.09 | (−0.30, 0.47) | 0.66 |
| Household income | −0.85 | (−1.56, −0.14) | 0.02 |
| Tenure (ref. owner) | |||
| Renter | 2.62 | (1.88, 3.37) | 0.00 |
| Number of years lived in dwelling | −0.03 | (−0.07, 0.02) | 0.20 |
| Gentrification (ref. no) | |||
| Yes | 1.54 | (0.16, 2.93) | 0.03 |
| Random effects | |||
| Tract variance | 2.43 | (1.32, 4.50) | 0.01 |
Significance level: P = 0.05