Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 17;12(7):e0180829. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180829

Table 6. The average effective Young’s modulus (YM) values and circumferential shrinkage values for 16 carotid plaque samples based on Cine MRI data by using 2D and 3D thin-layer model.

Plaque 2D model 3D thin-layer model Variation
YM C-Shrink YM C-Shrink δ˗YM˗Model δ˗C˗Shrink
(kPa) (%) (kPa) (%) (%) (%)
P1 342 12.3 370 7.40 8.38 -4.86
P2 320 11.2 348 6.26 8.44 -4.91
P3 156 16.8 169 12.3 7.98 -4.56
P4 493 6.29 531 1.05 7.99 -5.24
P5 328 9.53 357 4.51 9.04 -5.02
P6 341 9.15 371 4.11 8.74 -5.04
P7 561 7.54 601 2.45 7.11 -5.09
P8 604 6.31 650 1.07 7.91 -5.24
P9 177 12.1 191 7.48 7.85 -4.62
P10 126 14.4 137 9.88 8.90 -4.48
P11 323 9.62 352 4.56 8.85 -5.05
P12 441 9.12 476 3.96 8.00 -5.16
P13 104 25.0 109 21.7 5.19 -3.29
P14 208 19.0 222 14.7 6.85 -4.24
P15 453 6.20 492 0.92 8.67 -5.29
P16 856 3.67 922 -1.78 7.78 -5.44
Ave by Patient 365 11.1 394 6.29 7.98 -4.85
Ave (81 Slices) 380 10.5 411 5.62 8.16 -4.88
Min 104 3.67 109 -1.78 5.19 -5.44
Max 856 25.0 922 21.7 9.04 -3.29

Note: c2 = 0 and D2 = 2 for all cases. Due to axial shrink applied to the 3D thin-layer model, some C-Shrink values in 3D thin-layer model were negative. Both averages by patients and by slices are given.