Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 17;12(7):e0181452. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181452

Table 4. Pearson correlation coefficients between different methods of morphological and metagenetic analyses.

Correlation (species or MOTU numbers/biomass or sequence reads)
Taxon Station Morphology-MiSeq Morphology-454 MiSeq-454
Order Slope 0.992**/0.937* 0.986*/0.812 0.991**/0.954*
Kuroshio 0.998**/0.993** 0.996**/0.990** 0.996**/0.999**
Subtropical 0.987*/0.972** 0.965*/0.923* 0.993**/0.986**
Family Slope 0.446/0.888** 0.501/0.912** 0.877**/0.993**
(Calanoida) Kuroshio 0.906**/0.716** 0.889**/0.825** 0.953**/0.980**
Subtropical 0.854**/0.796** 0.874**/0.920** 0.942**/0.922**

Both species/MOTU number (left) and biomass/sequence reads (right) were correlated at each station. Comparisons were performed at both the order-level and family-level of taxonomic groups, which are shown in Figs 3 and 4. Significant correlations are indicated by asterisks (*P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01).