Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jul 15.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2017 Apr 11;155:460–472. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.04.004

Table 4.

Brain localization: comparison between the state-of-the-art machine learning technique [29] and our template matching technique. Best scores are highlighted in bold.

Brain localization method # of failures (failure rate) # of success (success rate)
Machine-learning [29] 10 (6.5%) 144 (93.5%)
Proposed approach 11 (7.1%) 143 (92.9%)