Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 17;7:5517. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-04811-5

Figure 3.

Figure 3

External and internal validation of the three-gene prognostic model. Two independent expression microarray HCC data sets GSE54236 (A) and GSE14520 (B) were downloaded from the GEO and were used as the signature validation cohort. The risk scores were calculated as Prognostic Index (PI) = 0.384 × RTN3-0.561 × SOCS2-0.434 × UPB1. (C) Kaplan-Meier curves of overall survival in the TCGA cohort stratified by the three-gene prognostic signature. We used the time-dependent ROC curve analysis to assessed the prognostic accuracy of the three-gene prognostic signature of the microarray data and LIHC dataset (Fig. 3A lower panel, Fig. 3B lower panel, Fig. 3C lower panel). ROC: receiver operator characteristic. AUC: area under the curve. (D) Kaplan–Meier curves of HCC patients based on the SOCS2 (left panel), RTN3 (middle panel), or UPB1 (right panel) expression level. 360 patients were sorted by the RSEM values of a gene, and the lower third of the patients was defined as the low mRNA expression, the upper third as high mRNA expression, thus divided patients into 3 groups. (E) The survival curve of HCC patients stratified by T stage and gene expression. Firstly, 360 patients were divided into two groups based on SOCS2 (left panel), RTN3 (middle panel), or UPB1 (right panel) expression. The cutoff value of high and low expression was set as the median. Then, patients were classified into three subgroups according to the T stage. (F) Survival curves of 360 HCC patients based on the combination of RTN3 and UPB1 (left panel), RTN3 and SOCS2 (middle panel), SOCS2 and UPB1 (right panel) expression. The cutoff value of high and low expression was set as the median.