Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 20;2(2):211–219. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2017.03.004

Table 3.

Associations between PRD and survival after definitive RTa

PRD level Survival after RT (95% CI)
Univariable analysis
Multivariable analysisb
1 y after RT 2 y after RT HR (95% CI) P value HR (95% CI) P value
As a continuous variable
 3-unit increase NA NA 1.34 (1.08-1.65) .007 1.39 (1.11-1.74) .004
As a categorical variable .11c .10c
 Low distress, 0-3 (n = 295) 90% (86%-94%) 83% (77%-89%) 1.00 (reference) NA 1.00 (reference) NA
 Moderate distress, 4-6 (n = 222) 84% (79%-90%) 73% (66%-81%) 1.58 (1.02-2.44) .042 1.62 (1.03-2.56) .038
 High distress, 7-10 (n = 161) 87% (81%-93%) 74% (65%-84%) 1.42 (0.88-2.30) .15 1.49 (0.90-2.48) .12
 Moderate or high distress, 4-10 (n = 383) 85% (81%-89%) 74% (68%-80%) 1.51 (1.02-2.24) .042 1.57 (1.03-2.38) .034

CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; NA, not applicable; PRD, patient-reported distress; RT, radiation therapy.

a

HRs, 95% CIs, and P values were determined from Cox proportional hazards regression models.

b

Multivariable models were adjusted for age, sex, primary cancer site, RT dose, metastatic disease at the start of RT, chemotherapy at or before the start of RT, and surgery at or before the start of RT.

c

Test of overall difference.