Table 2.

Group comparison of social cognition, social skills, self-reported social functioning impairments, and symptoms between UHR patients and healthy controls.

Social cognitive task	UHR patients			Healthy controls			p	Cohen's d
	Mean	SD	N	Mean	SD	N
TASIT totala	53.08	4.53	62	55.13	3.52	30	.046⁎	.51
CANTAB ERT total percent correct	69.38	6.75	61	72.87	6.24	30	.023⁎	.54
ERT happy	81.84	9.25	61	82.33	11.45	30	.956	.05
ERT sada	82.60	13.67	61	83.78	10.60	30	.867	.10
ERT angry	57.46	9.40	61	61.44	7.25	30	.043⁎	.47
ERT disgusta	68.70	13.80	61	78.56	11.77	30	.001⁎⁎	.77
ERT fear	46.07	21.28	61	55.67	18.13	30	.035⁎	.49
ERT surprise	80.10	7.28	61	77.44	9.13	30	.118	.32
SCSQ totala	20.19	1.81	63	20.54	1.43	28	.458	.21
HiSoC total	55.17	5.91	42	62.48	7.89	27	˂.001⁎⁎	1.05
SRS-A total	73.89	27.81	45	26.04	15.95	28	˂.001⁎⁎	2.11
SOFAS	56.25	10.02	65	88.83	4.09	30	˂.001⁎⁎	4.26
PSP	56.42	9.08	64	87.63	5.56	30	˂.001⁎⁎	4.15
GF:Role	5.72	1.13	65	8.75	.54	30	˂.001⁎⁎	3.42
GF:Social	6.39	1.04	65	8.73	.45	30	˂.001⁎⁎	2.92
AQoL-8D	.44	.14	62	.89	.08	30	˂.001⁎	3.95

The table displays the raw scores.

Note: TASIT: The Awareness of Social Inferences Task; SCSQ: the Social Cognition Screening Questionnaire; CANTAB ERT: Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery, Emotion Recognition Task; HiSoC: The High Risk Social Challenge; SRS-A: Social Responsiveness Scale Adult Version; SOFAS: Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale; PSP: Personal and Social Performance scale; GF:Role: Global Functioning Role scale; GF:Social: Global Functioning Social scale; AQoL-8D: Assessment of Quality of Life.

Comparisons were done using a general linear model adjusted for age and gender. With the exception of the SRS-A higher scores on the tasks indicate better performance or higher level of functioning.

^aThese variables were transformed to account for skewness.

^⁎p ≤ .05.

^⁎⁎p ≤ .01.