Skip to main content
. 2017 May 17;21:182–187. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2017.05.011

Table 2.

The virologic responses in both groups.

Response Fixed 12 weeks (Ref.) Response-tailored (test) Proportion difference (Ref-test) Z P (2-tail)
vRVR (ITT) 49/60 (81.67%) (CI: 70.08–89.44%) 48/60 (80%) (CI: 68.22–88.17%) 1.67%) (CI: − 12.51–+15.78%) 0.232 0.817
SVR12 (ITT) 58/60 (96.67%) (CI: 88.64–99%) 59/60 (98.33%) (CI: 91.14–99.71%) (− 1.67%) (CI: − 9.8%–+5.9%) 0.6 0.569
SVR12 (PP) 58/59 (98.31%) (CI: 91–99.7%) 59/59 (100%) (CI: 93.89–100%) (− 1.69%) (CI: − 9%–+4.58%) 1 0.315
SVR12/8w (ITT) 47/48 (97.92%) (CI: 89.1–99.6%)
SVR12/8w (PP) 47/47 (100%) (CI: 92.4–100%)

vRVR (very rapid virologic response at week 2).

SVR12 (sustained virologic response at 12 weeks post-treatment).

SVR12/8w (sustained virologic response at 12 weeks after the end of 8 weeks-treatment course).

Data are n/N (%) (95% Confidence Interval (CI:) by Wilson score method).

ITT (Intention-to-treat population); PP (Per Protocol analysis for those who completed the full protocol).