Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 18;8(1):33–42. doi: 10.2217/epi.15.101

Table 3. . Crude and adjusted association between DNA methylation and birth weight.

Methylation Birth weight
  Crude model
Adjusted model
  β (95% CI) p-value β (95% CI) p-value
HSD11B2
-0.048 (-0.083 to -0.012)
0.009**
-0.027 (-0.053 to -0.002)
0.033*
NR3C1
0.008 (-0.005–0.021)
0.229
-0.003 (-0.012–0.006)
0.557
WNT2:        
– High -0.018 (-0.040–0.005) 0.121 -0.019 (-0.037 to -0.002) 0.034*
– Low
0.011 (-0.014–0.037)
0.387
0.010 (-0.005–0.025)
0.198
IGF2:        
– Pos.1 0.017 (0.001–0.034) 0.043* 0.009 (-0.002 to 0.020) 0.125
– Pos.2
0.010 (-0.001–0.020)
0.072
0.008 (0.001–0.015)
0.026*
IL6:        
– Pos.1 -0.003 (-0.032–0.026) 0.819 -0.008 (-0.027–0.011) 0.386
– Pos.2
0.006 (-0.010–0.021)
0.468
0.002 (-0.008–0.013)
0.683
AHRR:        
– Pos.1 0.020 (0.006–0.033) 0.005** 0.010 (0.001–0.019) 0.027*
– Pos.2 0.010 (-0.001–0.022) 0.076 0.006 (-0.001–0.013) 0.086
– Pos.3 0.001 (-0.012–0.012) 0.956 0.004 (-0.003–0.012) 0.250

Methylation level of each gene was modeled as the independent variable associated with birth weight as the dependent variable.

Adjusted for gestational age, infant gender, birth type, prenatal vitamin use and environmental tobacco smoke during pregnancy.

*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01.

High: High WNT2 methylation group; Low: Low WNT2 methylation group; Pos.1: The first studied CpG site; Pos.2: The second studied CpG site; Pos.3: The third studied CpG site.