Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuropsychologia. 2017 May 1;101:65–75. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.04.036

Table 2.

Comprehensive correlational analyses. All statistics are reported as two-tailed Pearson correlations except correlations with age, reported as two-tailed Spearman correlations.

Pearson Correlation Matrix between Hippocampal Dentation and Memory

Hippocampal Dentation Hippocampal VolumeA


Right Left Right Left
Demographic Variables
 AgeB 0.33 (p = .13) 0.27 (p = .22) 0.37 (p = .09) 0.28 (p = .20)
 Years of Education 0.09 (p = .68) 0.18 (p = .42) 0.20 (p = .36) 0.11 (p = .63)
 IQ Estimate 0.22 (p = .33) 0.25 (p = .26) 0.33 (p = .13) 0.39 (p = .08)
Episodic Memory
 CVLT-II Acquisition 0.36 (p = .10) 0.36 (p = .10) 0.51 (p = . 02)* 0.47 (p = .03)*
 CVLT-II LDFR 0.38 (p = .08) 0.49 (p = .02)* 0.41 (p = .06) 0.32 (p = .15)
 Rey Delay 0.09 (p = .69) 0.13 (p = .58) 0.19 (p = .40) 0.11 (p = .63)
 Rey Recognition 0.50 (p = .02)* 0.49 (p = .02)* 0.001 (p = .99) 0.12 (p = .57)
A

Raw hippocampal volume (uncorrected for whole brain volume).

B

Values represent Spearman ρ values and associated significance levels. A priori hypotheses are noted in bold type.

*

Denotes significance at the p < .05 level, uncorrected.