Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 14;8(23):37896–37911. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.14664

Figure 3. Forest plots of relationship for 24 kinds of chemotherapy regimens in terms of DCR and ORR (DCR = disease control rate; ORR = overall response rate; A: cisplatin + fluorouracil; B: fluorouracil; C: S-1; D: capecitabine; E: docetaxel + cisplatin; F: irinotecan + cisplatin; G: cisplatin + capecitabine; H: S-1 + cisplatin; I: docetaxel + fluorouracil; J: paclitaxel + fluorouracil; K: fluorouracil + leucovorin; L: docetaxel + oxaliplatin; M: S-1 + irinotecan; N: S-1 + paclitaxel; O: etoposide + adriamycin + cisplatin; P: docetaxel + cisplatin + fluorouracil; Q: etoposide + cisplatin + fluorouracil; R: fluorouracil + adriamycin + mitomycin; S: fluorouracil + adriamycin + methotrexate; T: etoposide + leucovorin + fluorouracil; U: fluorouracil + leucovorine + irinotecan; V: etoposide + cisplatin + capecitabine; W: fluorouracil + leucovorin + cisplatin; X: cisplatin + etoposide + leucovorin + fluorouracil; a: DCR; b: ORR).

Figure 3