Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 5;20(1):21419. doi: 10.7448/IAS.20.1.21419

Table 3.

HIV testing algorithm performance per study site.

  Conakry, Guinea Kitgum*, Uganda Kitgum*#, Uganda Arua*, Uganda Homa Bay, Kenya Douala*, Cameroun Baraka*, DRC Baraka*#, DRC
Included in the study based on HIV status tested at site
Total, n 446 438 438 443 500 462 497 497
Positive, n (%) 222 (49.8) 218 (49.7) 216 (49.6) 212 (47.9) 223 (44.6) 222 (48.1) 226 (45.5) 221 (44.5)
Negative, n (%) 220 (49.3) 220 (50.3) 220 (50.2) 231 (52.1) 277 (55.4) 230 (49.8) 219 (44.1) 220 (44.2)
Inconclusive, n (%) 4 (0.9) 0 (0) 2 (0.2) 0 (0) 0 (0) 10 (2.2) 52 (10.5) 56 (11.3)
Results based on reference standard
Positive, n (%) 222 (49.8) 214 (48.9) 214 (48.9) 212 (47.9) 224 (44.8) 214 (46.3) 221 (44.5) 221 (44.5)
Negative, n (%) 224 (50.2) 222 (50.7) 222 (50.7) 230 (51.9) 276 (55.2) 247 (53.5) 275 (55.3) 275 (55.3)
Indeterminate n (%) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 1 (0.2) 0 (0.0) 1 (0.2) 1 (0.2) 1 (0.2)
Acute infection (%) 0 (0.0) 2 (0.5) 2 (0.5) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
Diagnostic performance of algorithm at study site
Sensitivity % (95% CI) 100 (98.3–100) 96.2 (78.1–99.4) 96.2 (78.2–99.4) 89.5 (76.2–95.8) 98.7 (96.1–99.7) 100 (98.3–100) 100 (98.3–100) 100 (98.3–100)
Specificity % (95% CI) 100 (98.3–100) 99.8 (99.4–99.9) 99.9 (99.6–100) 99.8 (99.3–99.9) 99.3 (97.4–99.9) 98.3 (96.7–99.1) 98.5 (95.7–99.5) 99.9 (99.7–100)
PPV % (95% CI) 100 (98.3–100) 98.2 (95.3–99.5) 99.1 (96.7–99.9) 98.6 (95.9–99.7) 99.1 (96.8–99.9) 96.4 (93.0–98.4) 97.8 (94.9–99.3) 99.5 (97.5–100)
NPV % (95% CI) 100 (98.3–100) 99.1 (96.7–99.9) 99.5 (97.5–100) 98.3 (95.6–99.5) 98.9 (96.9–99.8) 100 (98.4–100) 100 (98.3–100) 100 (98.3–100)
False positive, n 0 4 2 3 2 8 5 1
False negative, n 0 1 1 4 3 0 0 0

DRC: Democratic Republic of Congo.

*Adjusted results considering verification bias and excluding indeterminate results on-site and seroconverters by the reference algorithm.

#Algorithm using a simple confirmatory assay (ImmunoComb II HIV 1&2 CombFirm, Orgenics, Israel) with an alternative interpretation by Médecins sans Frontières.