Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 2;1:15003. doi: 10.1038/npjbcancer.2015.3

Table 5. Performance of ConSig1 and ConSig2 in the validation sets for predicting pathological complete response.

Validation set ConSig NAC AUC 95% CI P value NPV (%) PPV (%) OR 95% CI P value
EORTC/BIG00-01 ConSig1 A 0.70 0.55–0.85 5.2×10−3 74 75 8.33 2.00–44.44 6.0×10−3
A+T 0.60 0.43–0.77 0.12 62 70 3.81 0.87–20.75 0.09
ConSig2 A 0.65 0.50–0.80 2.4×10−2 62 42 1.15 0.29–4.40 0.83
A+T 0.65 0.49–0.81 3.6×10−2 59 60 2.13 0.50–9.92 0.31
NKI ConSig1 A 0.74 0.61–0.87 1.3×10−4 64 77 5.95 1.53–29.99 1.6×10−2
ConSig2 A 0.64 0.49–0.78 3.1×10−2 59 62 2.30 0.65–8.86 0.20

Abbreviations: A, anthracycline-based chemotherapy; A+T, anthracycline+taxane chemotherapy; AUC, area under the ROC curve; CI, confidence interval; ConSig, Consensus Signature; EORTC, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer; NAC, neoadjuvant chemotherapy; NKI, Netherlands Cancer Institute; NPV, negative predictive value; OR, odds ratio for lack of pathological complete response; PPV, positive predictive value; ROC, receiver-operating characteristic.