Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jul 18.
Published in final edited form as: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016 Apr 5;27(6):661–669. doi: 10.1111/jce.12964

TABLE 2.

AF Triggers and Substrates Between Index and Repeat Procedures

Characteristic All Patients
(n = 29)
FIRM+Conventional
Index Case (n = 9)
Conventional Index
Case (n = 20)
P
Index case
Number of concurrent sources 3.2 ± 1.4 4.4 ± 1.0 3.2 ± 1.4 0.02
No. of left atrial AF sources 2.3 ± 0.7 2.3 ± 0.7 1.9 ± 0.6 0.10
  Total left atrial sources 63 24 39
No. of right atrial AF sources 1.9 ± 0.6 2.0 ± 0.5 1.8 ± 0.6 0.49
  Total right atrial sources 34 16 18
No. PV connected 3.9 ± 0.4 3.9 ± 0.3 3.9 ± 0.4 0.95
AF cycle length, milliseconds 167 ± 19 165 ± 18 168 ± 19 0.67
Ablation
  No. PV isolated 3.9 ± 0.4 3.9 ± 0.3 3.9 ± 0.4 0.95
  Linear ablation 26 7 19 0.45
  Roof 24 7 17
  Mitral isthmus 1 0 1
  Cavotricuspid isthmus 9 0 9
Repeat case (n = 26) (n = 8) (n = 18)
Time since index case/months 21.4 ± 19.9 11.9 ± 4.8 25.7 ± 22.6 0.08
No. of concurrent sources 3.0 ± 1.2* 2.9 ± 1.7* 3.1 ± 1.0 0.73
No. of left atrial AF sources 2.0 ± 0.8* 1.9 ± 0.9* 1.9 ± 0.7 0.80
  Conserved versus index 37/46 10/13 27/33 0.70
  New versus index 9/46 3/13 6/33
No. of right atrial AF sources 1.8 ± 0.7 1.7 ± 0.5 1.9 ± 0.7 0.51
Conserved versus index 24/29 9/10 15/19 0.63
  New versus index 5/29 1/10 4/19
  No. PV connected 2.7 ± 1.7* 3.0 ± 1.5* 2.5 ± 1.7* 0.46
AF cycle length, milliseconds 177 ± 21* 180 ± 19* 176 ± 23 0.62

Statistical analyses were done using Mann–Whitney U for unmatched groups, Wilcoxon signed rank test for matched pairs, and Fisher exact test for contingency tables.

P < 0.05 compared to initial case.

3/29 patients had atrial tachycardias and were non-inducible for AF.