Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jul 18.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Assess. 2014 Feb 17;26(2):513–527. doi: 10.1037/a0035768

Table 4.

Correlations, Mean Differences, and Standard Deviations of Actual Versus Linked PROMIS Depression T Scores

Linking method/instrument Correlation Mean difference SD of differences
CES-D
 IRT pattern scoring .84 0.31 5.46
 IRT cross-walk scoring .82 0.09 5.78
 EQP, SM = 0.0 .81 0.03 5.93
 EQP, SM = 0.3 .80 0.30 6.20
 EQP, SM = 1.0 .79 0.42 6.46
PHQ-9
 IRT pattern scoring .83 0.36 6.34
 IRT cross-walk scoring .81 0.43 6.73
 EQP, SM = 0.0 .80 0.18 6.88
 EQP, SM = 0.3 .80 0.06 6.80
 EQP, SM = 1.0 .80 0.08 6.82
BDI-II
 IRT pattern scoring .87 0.21 5.87
 IRT cross-walk scoring .86 0.21 6.01
 EQP, SM = 0.0 .86 0.14 6.00
 EQP, SM = 0.3 .86 0.18 6.00
 EQP, SM = 1.0 .86 0.16 6.02

Note. PROMIS = Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System; IRT = item response theory; CES-D = Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale; PHQ-9 = 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire; BDI-II = Beck Depression Inventory–II; EQP = equipercentile; SM postsmoothing.