Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 May 4.
Published in final edited form as: Nanoscale. 2017 May 4;9(17):5664–5670. doi: 10.1039/c7nr01369h

Table 1.

Comparison of annealing and melting rates of two reporter strands at different Tris-HCl and glycerol concentration

reporter sequence (5′ to 3′) Tris-HCl buffer glycerol conc. kon (106M−1s−1) koff (s−1)
reporter strand-1 ATTO633-TGGGCGGG 20 mM 70% 5.13±0.40 9.55±0.64
4 mM 70% 3.63±0.66 21.60±0.40
20 mM 80% 0.45±0.05 10.99±2.0

reporter strand-2 ATTO633-TGATTGTG 20 mM 70% 5.65±0.56 15.71±1.98