Table 4. Antibiotic susceptibility pattern of predominant bacterial isolates from septic wounds at RIMS, Kadapa.
| Bacterial isolates | R/S Pattern | Antibiotics | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BP | AM | AP | KM | TM | SM | GM | T | VM | CF | CT | ||
| S.aureus | S | 0 (0.0%) |
0 (0.0%) |
0 (0.0%) |
19 (86.3%) |
21 (95.4%) |
22 (100%) |
22 (100%) |
22 (100%) |
20 (90.9%) | 22 (100%) |
20 (90.9%) |
| N = 22 | R | 22 (100%) |
22 (100%) |
22 (100%) |
3 (13.6%) |
1 (4.7%) |
0 (0.0%) |
0 (0.0%) |
0 (0.0%) |
2 (9.0%) |
0 (0.0%) |
2 (9.0%) |
| P.aeruginosa | S | 2 (7.6%) |
3 (11.5%) |
5 (19.3%) |
23 (88.4%) |
26 (100%) |
26 (100%) |
26 (100%) |
23 (88.4%) |
23 (88.4%) |
26 (100%) |
16 (61.5%) |
| N = 26 | R | 24 (92.3%) |
23 (88.4%) |
21 (80.7%) |
3 (11.3%) |
0 (0.0%) |
0 (0.0%) |
0 (0.0%) |
3 (11.3%) |
3 (11.3%) |
0 (0.0%) |
10 (38.5%) |
| K.pneumoniae | S | 3 (15%) |
3 (15%) |
5 (25%) |
18 (90%) |
20 (100%) |
20 (100%) |
20 (100%) |
20 (100%) |
19 (95%) |
20 (100%) |
16 (80%) |
| N = 20 | R | 17 (85%) |
17 (85%) |
15 (75%) |
2 (10.0%) |
0 (0.0%) |
0 (0.0%) |
0 (0.0%) |
0 (0.0%) |
1 (5%) |
0 (0.0%) |
4 (20%) |
| E.coli | S | 2 (10.5%) |
2 (10.5%) |
3 (15.7%) |
19 (100%) |
19 (100%) |
11 (57.8%) |
19 (100%) |
8 (42.1%) |
19 (100%) |
19 (100%) |
19 (100%) |
| N = 19 | R | 17 (89.4%) |
17 (89.4%) |
16 (84.2%) |
0 (0.0%) |
0 (0.0%) |
8 (42.1%) |
0 (0.0%) |
11 (57.8%) |
0 (0.0%) |
0 (0.0%) |
0 (0.0%) |
| Total | S | 7 (8.1%) |
8 (9.1%) |
13 (15%) |
83 (95.4%) |
86 (98.8%) |
84 (96.5%) |
87 (100%) |
81 (93.1%) |
81 (93.1%) | 87 (100%) |
79 (90.8%) |
| N = 87 | R | 80 (91.9%) |
79 (90.8%) |
74 (85%) |
4 (4.5%) |
1 (1.1%) |
3 (3.4%) |
0 (0.0%) |
6 (6.8%) |
6 (6.8%) |
0 (0.0%) |
8 (9.1%) |
S- Sensitive, R- Resistant, BP-benzyl penicillin, AM-ammoxillin, AP-ampicillin, KM-kanamycin, TM-tobramycin, GM-gentamycin, SM- streptomycin, CT-cefotaxime, VM-vancomycin, T-tetracycline, CF-ciprofloxacin.