Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 30;139(27):9148–9151. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b05149

Table 1. Optimization of the Hydroboration Reactiona.

graphic file with name ja-2017-05149h_0005.jpg

entry 4 solvent H source yield (%)b rrc erd
1e 4c THF i-PrOH 0 N/A N/A
2 4a THF i-PrOH 1 77:23 N/A
3 4b THF i-PrOH 7 97:3 90:10
4 4b THF MeOH 23 95:5 89:11
5 4b THF TFE 1 94:6 N/A
6 4b THF t-BuOH 2 95:5 N/A
7 4b THF H2O 15 95:5 89:11
8 4b THF BzOH 1 98:2 N/A
9 4b DME H2O 33 97:3 89:11
10 4b heptane H2O 48 (44) 98:2 89:11
11f 4b heptane H2O 79 (76) 98:2 90:10
12f 4a heptane H2O 3 80:20 N/A
13f,g 4c heptane H2O (38) 95:5 90:10
14f 4d heptane none 63 25:75 77:23
a

Reactions conducted with 0.38 mmol 2a.

b

Yields determined by GC analysis by using biphenyl as an internal standard; yields of isolated product in parentheses.

c

The branched/linear ratio (rr) was determined by GC analysis of the crude reaction mixture.

d

Determined by chiral SFC analysis following oxidation of 3a.

e

5 mol % NaOt-Bu was used as an additive; reaction conducted at 60 °C; diboration product 5 was isolated in 86% yield, 98:2 er.

f

Reaction conditions: 5 mol % catalyst 1a, 1.5 equiv boron source 4, 6 equiv proton source, 1 M concentration, 40 °C, 16 h.

g

Diboration product 5 was isolated in 6% yield, 81:19 er.