Skip to main content
. 2005 Mar;15(3):436–442. doi: 10.1101/gr.2754005

Table 1.

Output summary of the novoSNP, PolyPhred, and PolyBayes SNP analysis on the SCN1A mutation and MAPT SNP data sets analyzed under different quality cutoff values

Quality cutoff Total number of SNPs Correctly identified False positives False negatives
A. SCN1A
novoSNP 10 447 33 414 92.6% 0 0.0%
15 122 32 90 73.8% 1 3.0%
20 36 26 10 27.8% 7 21.2%
25 26 22 4 15.4% 11 33.3%
PolyPhred 20 586 30 556 94.9% 3 9.1%
25 510 30 480 94.1% 3 9.1%
50 347 30 317 91.4% 3 9.1%
75 254 30 224 88.2% 3 9.1%
95 208 30 178 85.6% 3 9.1%
99 189 26 163 86.2% 7 21.2%
PolyBayes 0.1 54 18 36 66.7% 15 45.5%
0.25 46 17 29 63.0% 16 48.5%
0.5 37 16 21 56.8% 17 51.5%
0.75 33 16 17 51.5% 17 51.5%
B. MAPT
novoSNP 5 3424 442 2982 87.1% 10 2.2%
10 1146 421 725 63.3% 31 6.9%
15 484 377 107 22.1% 75 16.6%
20 251 244 7 2.8% 208 46.0%
25 206 203 3 1.5% 249 55.1%
PolyPhred 20 2637 280 2357 89.4% 172 38.1%
25 2510 280 2230 88.8% 172 38.1%
50 2243 271 1972 87.9% 181 40.0%
75 1892 252 1640 86.7% 200 44.2%
95 1677 207 1470 87.7% 245 54.2%
99 1572 175 1397 88.9% 277 61.3%
PolyBayes 0.1 991 140 851 85.9% 312 69.0%
0.25 830 136 694 83.6% 316 69.9%
0.5 672 126 546 81.2% 326 72.1%
0.75 567 115 452 79.7% 337 74.6%

For the SCN1A data set, the lowest novoSNP shown cutoff is 10 since all SNPs were found at this cutoff value.