Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 18;59(4):658–671. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201500236

Table 2.

Effect estimates (posterior medians and 95% credibility intervals) for the examples from Section 3 using different priors for the heterogeneity τ

Heterogeneity prior Crins et al. Miller et al. Mozobil Romiplostim Krystexxa
τhalf‐Normal(1.0) 0.16 (0.04, 0.78) 0.59 (0.18, 1.74) 5.34 (1.80, 15.95) 0.19 (0.04, 0.80) 7.14 (1.04, 49.15)
τhalf‐Normal(0.5) 0.16 (0.05, 0.49) 0.60 (0.29, 1.14) 5.34 (2.73, 10.48) 0.19 (0.07, 0.53) 7.14 (1.39, 36.70)
τlog‐Normal(‐1.048,1.046) 0.16 (0.05, 0.58) 0.60 (0.27, 1.23) 5.34 (2.56, 11.19) 0.19 (0.06, 0.60) 7.14 (1.25, 40.80)
τlog‐Normal(‐1.741,1.046) 0.16 (0.06, 0.45) 0.60 (0.35, 0.99) 5.34 (3.18, 8.98) 0.19 (0.07, 0.49) 7.14 (1.46, 35.01)
τ2inv‐Gamma(0.5,0.0076) 0.16 (0.06, 0.47) 0.60 (0.35, 1.00) 5.34 (3.14, 9.08) 0.19 (0.07, 0.51) 7.14 (1.39, 36.57)
τ2inv‐Gamma(0.5,0.0019) 0.16 (0.06, 0.42) 0.61 (0.41, 0.90) 5.33 (3.45, 8.25) 0.19 (0.08, 0.46) 7.14 (1.49, 34.08)