Table 3.
HLM Estimates of Positive and Negative Mood as Predicted Feeling Affected by Disidentification, Moderated by Centrality and Private Regard
| Positive | Negative | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
||||
| Variable names | Variables | B | SE | B | SE |
| Daily-level private regard | B00, P00 | 3.99*** | 0.82 | 4.78*** | 0.66 |
| Centrality | B01, P01 | 0.13 | 0.10 | 0.20* | 0.10 |
| Private regard | B02, P02 | 0.05 | 0.13 | −0.28** | 0.10 |
| Centrality × Private Regard | B03, P03 | −0.14 | 0.14 | −0.31** | 0.11 |
| Day of study | B10, P10 | −0.03*** | 0.01 | −0.02*** | 0.00 |
| Weekday/weekend | B20, P20 | 0.04 | 0.04 | −0.11** | 0.04 |
| Positive/negative mood | B30, P30 | −0.47*** | 0.04 | −0.37*** | 0.03 |
| Ethnic/racial disidentification | B40, P40 | 0.33* | 0.15 | 0.22 | 0.17 |
| Centrality | B41, P41 | −0.02 | 0.02 | −0.02 | 0.03 |
| Private regard | B42, P42 | −0.06* | 0.02 | −0.02 | 0.02 |
| Centrality × Private Regard | B43, P43 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.06* | 0.03 |
| Affected by ethnic/racial stereotype | B50, P50 | −0.03 | 0.02 | −0.01 | 0.02 |
Note. HLM = hierarchical linear model.
p < .05.
p < .01.
p < .001.