Skip to main content
. 2017 May 29;7(7):e00728. doi: 10.1002/brb3.728

Table 3.

Reward‐ versus loss‐related activations by GLM analysis when power features performed as regressors

Brain region AAL Lable Centers[MNI] z‐score (win vs. lose)
x (mm) y (mm) z (mm) alpha‐band power theta‐band power
Frontal_Sup_Orb_L Superior frontal gyrus, orbital part 5 −16.56 47.32 −13.31 0.20 0.38
Frontal_Mid_Orb_L Middle frontal gyrus, orbital part 9 −30.65 50.43 −9.62 0.32 0.54
Frontal_Inf_Orb_R Inferior frontal gyrus, orbital part 16 41.22 32.23 −11.91 0.49 0.65
Frontal_Sup_Medial_L Superior frontal gyrus, medial 23 −4.8 49.17 30.89 0.51 0.82
Frontal_Sup_Medial_R Superior frontal gyrus, medial 24 9.1 50.84 30.22 0.34 0.42
Cingulum_Ant_L Anterior cingulate and paracingulate gyri 31 −4.04 35.4 13.95 0.79 1.02
Cingulum_Ant_R Anterior cingulate and paracingulate gyri 32 8.46 37.01 15.84 0.47 0.58
Caudate_L Caudate nucleus 71 −11.46 11 9.24 1.49 1.72
Caudate_R Caudate nucleus 72 14.84 12.07 9.42 0.79 0.92
Putamen_L Lenticular nucleus, putamen 73 −23.91 3.86 2.4 0.74 0.81

GLM, general linear models; AAL, anatomical labeling template; MNI, montreal neurologic institute.