Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jul 11.
Published in final edited form as: Circulation. 2017 Jul 11;136(2):215–231. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.027134

Table 2.

Electrophysiological parameters and their ability to predict adverse arrhythmic events

Category Parameter Studies Events n (%) Odds ratios (95% CI) PPV (%) NPV (%) P value
Autonomic Baroreflex sensitivity 2 48/359 (13.4) 1.98 (0.60–6.59) 16.3 89.9 0.23
Heart rate turbulence 3 66/434 (15.2) 2.57 (0.64–10.36) 22.1 88.1 0.16
Heart rate variability 4 83/630 (13.2) 1.72 (0.80–3.73) 16.9 89.7 0.13
Surface electrical QRS duration & LBBB 10 262/1797 (14.6) 1.51 (1.13–2.01) 18.5 87.6 0.01
Fragmented QRS 2 65/652 (10.0) 6.73 (3.85–11.76) 24.0 94.8 <0.001
Positive SAECG 10 152/1119 (13.6) 2.11 (1.18–3.78) 18.9 89.5 0.017
T-wave alternans 12 177/1631 (10.9) 4.66 (2.55–8.53) 14.8 97.0 <0.001
QRS-T angle 1 97/455 (21.3) 2.01 (1.22–3.31) 25.4 85.5 0.006
Arrhythmia Positive EPS 15 146/936 (15.6) 2.49 (1.40–4.40) 29.2 86.9 0.004
Non-sustained VT 18 403/2746 (14.7) 2.92 (2.17–3.93) 20.7 90.3 <0.001

Figure adapted from30 (ECG – electrocardiogram, EPS – electrophysiological study, LBBB – left bundle branch block, NPV – negative predictive value, PPV positive predictive value, VT – ventricular tachycardia).