Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 7;2:15018. doi: 10.1038/npjsba.2015.18

Table 2. Distribution of bow–tie scores b(m) in each stress response pathway.

Bow–tie score b(m) Ion homeostasis Nutrient adaptation Osmotic stress Oxidative stress Heat shock Pheromone response
0.5–1.0a 5 Sho1/Pbs2, Hog1, Pbs2, Hog1/Msn2, Hog1 12 cAMP, EGO complex, Sit4, TORC1, Tap42/TORC1, ATP, Sit4/Tap42/TORC1, fructose 1,6-biphosphate, fructose 6-phosphate, glucose 6-phosphate 6 Hog1/Msn2, Pbs2, Hog1, Sho1/Pbs2 8 Sit4, Msn2, Hyr1/Yap1/Ybp1, Yap1-Ox, Glc7/Reg1, Bmh2 5 cAMP, Cdc25, Cyr1/Srv2, Msn2, Bcy1 23 Cdc24/Far1/Ste4/Ste18, Ste4/Ste18, Bem1/GTP/Cdc42/Cdc24/Far1/Ste4/Ste18, Bem1/GTP/Cdc42/Cdc24/Far1/Ste4/Ste18/Ste20, GTP Gpa1/Ste4/Ste18,Ste5/Ste50/Ste11/Ste7/Kss1, Ste5/Ste50/Ste11/Ste7/Fus3, Ste12, Dig1/Dig2/Ste12, Kss1, a-factor/Ste3, alpha-factor/Ste2
0.2–0.5 3 28 14 30 19 7
<0.2 81 133 67 71 41 2
0 529 325 245 268 190 162
R2 coefficientb 0.3165 0.8881 0.6902 0.5531 0.2243 0.8096
a

For molecules with very high bow–tie scores (0.5–1.0), the number of molecules in the map with bow–tie scores b(m) within this range are indicated above a list of molecules/complexes with these scores in each map. Molecules in different states (modification or localization) are represented without distinction. Instances separated with '/' indicate complexes.

b

R2 coefficient between bow–tie score and betweenness centrality.