Table 3.

Summary of hierarchical logistic regression for predictors of excessive drinking in the past 3 months among transgender women and men.

	Step 1				Step 2				Step 3
	Transgender women		Transgender men		Transgender women		Transgender men		Transgender women		Transgender men
Variable	OR	95% CI	OR	95% CI	AOR	95% CI	AOR	95% CI	AOR	95% CI	AOR	95% CI
Step 1: Demographics
Age (years)	.99	[.97, 1.01]	.99	[.92, 1.02]	.99	[.98, 1.01]	.98	[.95, 1.02]	.99	[.97, 1.01]	.99	[.95, 1.02]
NonWhite (vs. White)	.78	[.47, 1.29]	.96	[.54, 1.67]	.73	[.43, 1.24]	.98	[.56, 1.74]	.70	[.41, 1.19]	1.07	[.60, 1.91]
Income (US dollars)	1.00	[1.00, 1.01]	1.00	[.99, 1.01]	1.00	[1.00, 1.01]	1.00	[1.00, 1.01]	1.00	[1.00, 1.01]	1.00	[1.00, 1.01]
Completed education
High school or less (vs. college/university)	2.01*	[1.10, 3.68]	1.40	[.65, 3.03]	2.05*	[1.01, 3.82]	1.37	[.63, 3.00]	2.02*	[1.08, 3.77]	1.24	[.56, 2.77]
Some college (vs. college/university)	1.15	[.74, 1.79]	1.267	[.74, 2.17]	1.23	[.77, 1.94]	1.22	[.71, 2.11]	1.27	[.80, 2.02]	1.12	[.64, 1.94]
Single (vs. partnered)	1.12	[.75, 1.67]	.92	[.57, 1.49]	1.26	[.83, 1.91]	.94	[.58, 1.53]	1.27	[.84, 1.93]	.90	[.55, 1.48]
Step 2: Components of gender and sexuality
Sexual orientation
Gay/lesbian (vs. heterosexual/straight)					1.25	[.73, 2.16]	1.46	[.70, 3.02]	1.11	[.63, 1.95]	1.85	[.87, 3.97]
Bisexual (vs. heterosexual/straight)					.72	[.43, 1.20]	.72	[.32, 1.63]	.66	[.39, 1.11]	.91	[.39, 2.12]
Pansexual/queer (vs. heterosexual/straight)					.98	[.50, 1.93]	1.00	[.51, 1.96]	.78	[.38, 1.59]	1.43	[.68, 3.02]
Gender dysphoria					1.15**	[1.04, 1.27]	1.01	[.87,1.18]	1.14*	[1.02, 1.27]	1.03	[.88, 1.21]
Affirmed gender expression: part-time (vs. full-time)					1.62	[.96, 2.72]	.83	[.48, 1.43]	1.72	[.97, 3.02]	.88	[.50, 1.55]
Step 3: Minority stressors
Enacted stigma									1.06	[.93, 1.20]	.87	[.74, 1.09]
Internalized stigma									1.18	[.93, 1.54]	.74*	[.56, .97]
Social stigma									1.20	[.92, 1.54]	.98	[.73, 1.31]
Model summary statistics
Model χ2	9.12, p = .17		2.91, p = 82		31.48***		6.75, p = .82		36.55***		16.00, p = .31
−2 Log Likelihood	628.64		454.77		606.27		450.93		601.2		441.67
Nagelkerke R2	.02		.01		.08		.02		.09		.06

Note. AOR = Adjusted Odds Ratio;

^***p < .001;

^**p < .01;

^*p < .05.

Transgender women n = 596; transgender men n = 454.

Hosmer-Lemeshow test of fit of final models: transgender women, χ² = (df = 8) = 5.63, p = .69; transgender men, χ² = (df = 8) = 9.59, p = .30.