Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Prim Prev. 2017 Aug;38(4):419–445. doi: 10.1007/s10935-017-0469-4

Table 4.

Summary of hierarchical logistic regression for predictors of cannabis use in the past 3 months among transgender women and men.

Step 1
Step 2
Step 3
Transgender women
Transgender men
Transgender women
Transgender men
Transgender women
Transgender men
Variable OR 95% CI OR 95% CI AOR 95% CI AOR 95% CI AOR 95% CI AOR 95% CI







Step 1: Demographics
  Age (years) .98** [.96, .99] .95** [.92, .98] .98* [.95, 1.00] .96* [.93, 1.00] .97** [.96, .99] .96* [.93, 1.00]
  NonWhite (vs. White) .80 [.47, 1.37] .89 [.54, 1.45] .70 [.40, 1.21] .82 [.50, 1.37] .65 [.37, 1.14] .83 [.50, 1.38]
  Income (US dollars) 1.00* [.99, 1.00] 1.00 [.99, 1.01] 1.00 [.99, 1.00] 1.00 [1.00, 1.01] 1.00 [.99, 1.00] 1.00 [1.00, 1.01]
  Completed education
    High school or less (vs. college/university) 1.56 [.82, 2.99] .84 [.43, 1.66] 1.95* [1.00, 3.80] .94 [.57, 1.88] 1.95 [.99, 3.86] .89 [.44, 1.80]
    Some college (vs. college/university) 1.19 [.73, 1.92] .85 [.54, 1.35] 1.22 [.75, 2.01] .92 [.57, 1.47] 1.32 [.80, 2.17] .89 [.56, 1.44]
  Single (vs. partnered) 1.08 [.70, 1.65] .62* [.41, .95] 1.01 [.65, 1.56] .62* [.41, .96] 1.06 [.68, 1.65] .61* [.40, .95]
Step 2: Components of gender and sexualityComponents of gender and sexuality
  Sexual orientation
    Gay/Lesbian (vs. heterosexual/straight) 1.94* [1.00, 3.77] 1.31 [.64, 2.69] 1.56 [.78, 3.09] 1.40 [.67, 2.92]
    Bisexual (vs. heterosexual/straight) 2.22** [1.24, 4.00] 1.61 [.79, 3.31] 1.95* [1.07, 3.56] 1.70 [.82, 3.56]
    Pansexual/queer (vs. heterosexual/straight) 3.43*** [1.66, 7.10] 2.39** [1.28, 4.46] 2.40* [1.11, 5.20] 2.61** [1.32, 5.14]
  Gender dysphoria 1.08 [.96, 1.21] .99 [.86, 1.13] 1.03 [.90, 1.16] 1.00 [.87, 1.16]
  Affirmed gender expression: part-time (vs. full-time) .38*** [.23, .63] 1.07 [.66, 1.74] .38*** [.22, .66] 1.09 [.66, 1.78]
Step 3: Minority stressors
  Enacted stigma 1.05 [.93, 1.18] .99 [.87, 1.21]
  Internalized stigma 1.57*** [1.21, 2.03] .87 [.67, 1.12]
  Social stigma 1.19 [.91, 1.55] 1.05 [.82, 1.34]
Model summary statistics
  Model χ 2 23.56*** 15.18* 48.23*** 25.64** 61.98*** 27.16*
  −2 Log Likelihood 558.22 554.29 533.55 543.83 519.79 542.31
  Nagelkerke R2 .06 .05 .13 .08 .16 .08

Note. AOR = Adjusted Odds Ratio;

***

p < .001;

**

p < .01;

*

p < .05.

Transgender women n = 596; transgender men n = 459.

Hosmer-Lemeshow test of fit of final models: transgender women, χ2 = (df = 8) = 7.01, p = .54; transgender men, χ2 = (df = 8) = 9.16, p = .33.