Table 3.
A-Brainstem response to eRAVANS versus SHAM stimulation (all subjects included, MIG+HC) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||
MNI coordinates (mm) | Obex (mm) | Peak T-value | ||||||
Side | Cluster Size (voxels) | X | Y | Z | eRAVANS > SHAM | |||
Nucleus Tractus Solitarii | L | 2 | −8 | −38 | −42 | + 18 mm | 4.07 | |
| ||||||||
B- NTS connectivity to higher brain regions: eRAVANS versus SHAM stimulation in MIG | ||||||||
| ||||||||
MNI coordinates (mm) | Peak Z-score | |||||||
Side | Cluster Size (voxels) | X | Y | Z | eRAVANS >SHAM | eRAVANS | SHAM | |
| ||||||||
Anterior Insula | L | 529 | −30 | 18 | −6 | 3.14 | 3.04 | −2.32 |
Mid-Cingulate Cortex | L | 916 | −2 | 26 | 30 | 3.41 | 2.94 | −0.34 |
| ||||||||
C- Effects of eRAVANS on brainstem response to tactile (air-puff) trigeminal sensory stimulation: eRAVANS vs SHAM in MIG | ||||||||
| ||||||||
MNI coordinates (mm) | Obex (mm) | Peak T-value | ||||||
Side | Cluster Size (voxels) | X | Y | Z | eRAVANS > SHAM | |||
| ||||||||
Nucleus Raphe Centralis | L | 3 | 0 | −36 | −28 | +32 | 4.76 | |
Locus Coeruleus | L | −4 | −36 | −26 | +34 | 4.68 |