Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jul 19.
Published in final edited form as: J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2015 May 7;104(5):841–852. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.33435

TABLE III.

Results of DCs and Polymerization Rates of Methacrylate-Silorane Hybrid Formulations

Run ES-4:C0a (%:%) Coinitiator (%)b
DC (%)c
P.R.×100 (s−1)d
Appearance of Beam
EDMAB TTMSS C=C Epoxy C=C Epoxy
C0-EDMAB 0:100 1 68.6 (0.1) 28.73 (0.56) Transparent
ES 25%-EDMAB 25:75 1 71.8 (0.2) 24.92 (1.75) Transparent
ES 50%-EDMAB 50:50 1 69.6 (0.6) 40.1 (0.7) 22.70 (1.40) 2.56 (0.38) Turbid white
ES 75%-EDMAB 75:25 1 56.7 (1.1) 41.4 (0.3) 12.15 (0.93) 2.52 (0.41) Turbid white
ES-EDMAB 100:0 1 45.4 (0.4) 5.58 (0.08) Transparent
ES 50%-TTMSS 50:50 3 65.6 (0.2) 39.6 (0.5)   6.50 (0.29) 3.14 (0.18) Transparent
ES 75%-TTMSS 75:25 3 62.5 (1.7) 39.6 (1.6)   4.95 (0.81) 2.37 (0.11) Translucent
ES-TTMSS 3% 100:0 3 52.0 (0.9) 7.38 (0.12) Transparent
a

C0 was mixture of HEMA and BisGMA with a weight ratio of 45/55 (w/w).

b

The weight percent of coinitiator to the total resin.

c

The degree of conversion was obtained by real-time FTIR method after irradiation 600 s.

d

P.R.= Rp/[M0], s−1.

e

The appearance of polymer beams observed after the LED light 40-s irradiation. The value in the () is the standard deviation. – indicated the value cannot be obtained due to the characteristic peak of epoxy was too small.