Skip to main content
Frontline Gastroenterology logoLink to Frontline Gastroenterology
letter
. 2011 Sep 5;3(1):64. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2011-100002

Myocardial ischaemia during endoscopic procedures

Vikramjit Mitra 1, Deepak Dwarakanath 2
PMCID: PMC5517233  PMID: 28839634

‘Cardiac ischaemia and rhythm disturbances during elective colonoscopy’ by George et al in Frontline Gastroenterology 2010;1:131–7 merits comment. The number of colonoscopies continues to rise with the introduction of the bowel cancer screening programme. Apart from the potential complications of bleeding, perforation and oversedation, the cardiovascular effects of colonoscopy have not been studied in great detail. Two controlled studies examining the cardiovascular effects of colonoscopy have reported bradycardia, hypotension and ventricular ectopics.1 2 George et al's study is the first prospective, double-blind trial that provides objective evidence of potential clinically significant ischaemic (ST-T wave) changes and rhythm disturbances during elective colonoscopy in patients with known heart disease and to a lesser extent in those patients with a known cardiovascular risk profile. The study also confirms that there is no increased cardiovascular risk in healthy fit individuals who undergo colonoscopy.3

There will be a doubling of the population aged between 65 and 80 years old by 2030.4 Increasing age is an independent risk factor for coronary artery disease in asymptomatic individuals. Autopsy studies have shown a prevalence of obstructive coronary artery disease varying between 10% and 20% in the fourth decade and 50–70% in the eight decade.5 Consequently, we will perform more endoscopic procedures on an ageing population with a potential for significant cardiac injury.

Myocardial ischaemia is known to occur during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy including endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).6–9 Tachycardia alone is an important factor in the development of myocardial ischaemia during endoscopy.6 9 In 1996, Rosenberg et al conducted a prospective double-blind randomised controlled trial to assess the efficacy of metoprolol compared with placebo in preventing myocardial ischaemia during ERCP.10 This study showed that all patients (n=38) had a tachycardia during ERCP, but the rate in the metoprolol group was significantly lower compared with placebo. Eleven (29%) patients developed myocardial ischaemia (ST changes) during their ERCP, all related to tachycardia. Only one such event developed in the metoprolol arm (n=19). This is the only trial demonstrating the use of β-blockers in preventing myocardial ischaemia in patients undergoing endoscopic procedures. However, in this study, patients did not receive preoxygenation with supplemental oxygen, received morphine rather than pethidine and larger doses of hyoscine bromide were used than is common in Britain. Several other studies11–13 have demonstrated that the use of β-blockers prior to certain forms of non-cardiac surgery reduces cardiac complications (ischaemia and arrhythmia) and were incorporated in the American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association guidelines in the past.14

Like colonoscopy, ERCP can be a very challenging procedure and a significant proportion of ERCPs are carried out in the elderly population. Lessons from previous studies and the study by George et al can be extrapolated to ERCP practice. There may be a role for β-blockers in preventing cardiac ischaemia in high-risk patients during endoscopic procedures (ERCP and colonoscopy). This needs further investigation in view of the recent perioperative ischaemic evaluation trial,15 which demonstrated that β-blockers were not associated with any significant reduction in the risk of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality or heart failure, but were associated with a reduction in non-fatal myocardial infarction (number needed to treat (NNT)=63) and myocardial ischaemia (NNT=16) at the expense of an increase in non-fatal strokes (number needed to harm (NNH)=293). In terms of safety outcomes, β-blockers were associated with a high risk of perioperative bradycardia requiring treatment (NNH=22) and perioperative hypotension requiring treatment (NNH=17) without any increased risk of bronchospasm.

Following the results of the trial conducted by Rosenberg et al in 1996, we have been using metoprolol prior to ERCP at the University North Tees to reduce the risk of cardiac ischaemia and arrhythmias for the past 10 years without any complications (including strokes) after carefully screening patients for contraindications to β-blockers.

Footnotes

Competing interests: None.

Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

References

  • 1.Cappell MS. Safety and efficacy of colonoscopy after myocardial infarction: an analysis of 100 study patients and 100 control patients at two tertiary cardiac referral hospitals. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 60:901–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Taylor SA, Halligan S, O'Donnell C, et al. Cardiovascular effects at multi-detector row CT colonography compared with those at conventional endoscopy of the colon. Radiology 2003;229:782–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.George AT, Davis C, Rangaraj A, et al. Cardiac ischaemia and rhythm disturbances during elective colonoscopy. Frontline Gastroenterol 2010; 1:131–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lindsay DC, Freeman JG, Cobden I, et al. Should colonoscopy be the first investigation for colonic disease? Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1988;296:167–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Levin TR, Zhao W, Conell C, et al. Complications of colonoscopy in an integrated health care delivery system. Ann Intern Med 2006;145:880–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Rosenberg J, Jørgensen LN, Rasmussen V, et al. Hypoxaemia and myocardial ischaemia during and after endoscopic cholangiopancreatography: call for further studies. Scand J Gastroenterol 1992;27:717–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Fujita R, Kumura F. Arrythmias and ischemic changes of the heart induced by gastric endoscopic procedures. Am J Gastroenterol 1975;64:44–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Murray AW, Morran CG, Kenny GN, et al. Examination of cardiorespiratory changes during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Comparison of monitoring of arterial oxygen saturation, arterial pressure and the electrocardiogram. Anaesthesia 1991;46:181–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Rosenberg J, Stausholm K, Andersen IB, et al. No effect of oxygen therapy on myocardial ischaemia during gastroscopy. Scand J Gastroenterol 1996;31:200–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Rosenberg J, Overgaard H, Andersen M, et al. Double blind randomised controlled trial of effect of metoprolol on myocardial ischaemia during endoscopic cholangiopancreatography. BMJ 1996;313:258–61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Pasternack PF, Grossi EA, Baumann FG, et al. Beta blockade to decrease silent myocardial ischemia during peripheral vascular surgery. Am J Surg 1989;158:113–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Jakobsen CJ, Blom L. Effect of pre-operative metoprolol on cardiovascular and catecholamine response and bleeding during hysterectomy. Eur J Anaesthesiol 1992;9:209–15. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wesslén O, Hallhagen S, Ekroth R, et al. High-dose intravenous beta 1-blockade in patients early after cardiac operations. Negative inotropism versus myocardial oxygen economy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1992;104:1672–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Fleisher LA, Beckman JA, Brown KA, et al. ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation and Care for Noncardiac Surgery: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery): Developed in Collaboration With the American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Rhythm Society, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology, and Society for Vascular Surgery. Circulation 2007;116:1971–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bangalore S, Wettersley J, Pranesh S, et al. Perioperative beta blockers in patients having non-cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis. Lancet 2009;373:1764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontline Gastroenterology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES