Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul;56(4):402–411.

Table 1.

Dam fecal PCR analysis

Group DPI 3 PND 6 DPI 5 PND 8 DPI 7 PND 10 DPI 14 PND 17 DPI 18 PND 21 DPI 25 PND 28 DPI 32 PND 35 DPI 39 PND 42
A (n= 7)a % positive 100 100 100 100 100 86 71 57
mean ± 1 SDb 1618 ± 815 894 ± 796c 1735 ± 1135d 1596 ± 2349 7301 ± 8488 3292 ± 5704 1317 ± 1953 0.58 ± 0.89
DPI 3 PND 16 DPI 5 PND 18 DPI 7 PND 20 DPI 8 PND 21 DPI 15 PND 28 DPI 22 PND 35 DPI 29 PND 42
B (n = 8) % positive 100 100 100 100 100 100 63
mean ± 1 SD 63,584 ± 80,902 85,233 ± 68,566c 60,806 ± 34,258d 10,071 ± 12,320 1763 ± 3048 724 ± 1192 2.13 ± 5.30
a

Data from the dam that did not become infected were not included

b

Average units (pg. of DNA) per fecal pellet; limit of detection is 0.04 U/fecal pellet

c,d P < 0.05 between values with the same superscripted letter