Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 20;8:484. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2017.00484

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics.

Characteristics Pazopanib (n = 31) Everolimus (n = 31) P-value
Age 68.0 (8.0) 68.8 (7.9) P = 0.68
AGE GROUP
P = 0.59
<65 12 (38.7) 10 (32.3)
≥65 19 (61.3) 21 (67.7)
ECOG
0 17 (54.8) 6 (19.4) P = 0.007
1 10 (32.3) 22 (71.0)
2 4 (12.9) 2 (6.4)
3 1 (3.2)
KPS
<80 7 (22.6) 17 (54.8) P = 0.002
≥80 24 (77.4) 11 (35.5)
Unknown 3 (9.8)
RISK STATUS MSKCC
Good 6 (19.4) 2 (6.5) P = 0.30
Intermediate 21 (67.7) 22 (71.0)
Poor 4 (12.9) 6 (19.4)
Unknown 1 (3.2)
RISK STATUS IMDC
Good 6 (19.4) 2 (6.4) P = 0.22
Intermediate 21 (67.7) 22 (71.0)
Poor 1 (3.2) 3 (9.7)
Unknown 3 (9.7) 4 (6.4)
METASTASIS SITE
Lung 20 (64.5) 21 (67.7) P = 0.138
Liver 7 (22.6) 12 (38.7) P = 0.168
Kidney 14 (45.1) 9 (29.0) P = 0.188
Bone 9 (29.0) 8 (25.8) P = 0.775
Other 13 (41.9) 17 (54.8)* P = 0.309
*

Four patients had brain metastasis.

ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; KPS, Karnofsky Performance Status; MSKCC, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center; IMDC, International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium. Data were presented as mean (standard deviation) for continuous variables or number (frequency) for categorical variables.