Table 1.
The fitting parameters of the response functions in Eq. (1) of each figure. Note that the amplitudes such as D 0, A 0, and A 1 are not comparable between figures.
| Figure | D 0 | A 0 | A 1 | τ1 | A 2 | τ2 | A 3 | τ3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 (a) | −1.00 | 0.01 | None | None | None | None | None | None |
| 3 (a) | −0.38 | 1.09 | −2.59 | 3.9 ps | None | None | None | None |
| 4 (a) | −0.69 | 0.64 | −2.33 | 2.8 ps | 0.79 | 67.7 ps | None | None |
| 5 (a) | −0.14 | 2.82 | −11.2 | 4.1 ps | 2.15 | 74.6 ps | None | None |
| 6 (a) | −0.65 | 2.20 | −8.00 | 3.8 ps | 2.69 | 28 ps | 4.30 | 270 ps |
| 4 (b) | None | None | None | None | 0.85 | 0.18 ns | 1.19 | 1.68 ns |
But the scale of amplitudes in each figure keep comparable. The parameters of Fig. 4(b) were obtained without convolution process.